Proposed deletion of Joseph Doak

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joseph Doak, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Suspected hoax article as subject not in top 100 Australian rankings. (http://www.croquetrecords.com/rank/currentaus.htm)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Paste Let’s have a chat. 10:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Warnings

edit

February 2009

edit
  1.   Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sacred Heart College, Geelong, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply