Hey There edit

 
Welcome!

Hello, Thedons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! LostNecromancer 20:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Donscolours2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Donscolours.jpg. The copy called Image:Donscolours.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Donscolours2.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Donscolours2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 22:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded edit

Thanks for uploading Image:New Donny Logo.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:TheDonsLogo.jpg. The copy called Image:TheDonsLogo.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Brett Turner edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brett Turner, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  03:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of James Garmston edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Garmston, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  05:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Brett Turner edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Brett Turner, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Turner. Thank you.  The Windler talk  00:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dean Gorton edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dean Gorton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  10:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chris Buttery edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chris Buttery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Reasons in the article issues template below, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  06:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joe McLocklan edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joe McLocklan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of James Endersby edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Endersby, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shaun Leaf edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shaun Leaf, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Loz Wildbore edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Loz Wildbore, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mark Castle edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Castle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Craig Lawton edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Craig Lawton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of John Okul edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Okul, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Adam Robinson edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adam Robinson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, dosent meet Wikiproject Rugby leagues notability guidelines rules 2 and 9 in that a player who plays for a team not in a top grade rugby league competition, stub and likely to stay as such

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  07:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Scorpions.png edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Scorpions.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Yorkshire Flag copy.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Yorkshire Flag copy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Armbrust Talk Contribs 00:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:DONS Badge copy.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:DONS Badge copy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Armbrust Talk Contribs 00:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article notability notification edit

  Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Joel Penny, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Joel Penny"news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:31, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Rail Cup.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Northern Rail Cup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 14:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:National League Logo.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:National League Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:DONS Badge copy.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:DONS Badge copy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:New Donny Logo.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New Donny Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:BarrowRLlogo.jpg edit

 

The file File:BarrowRLlogo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poor quality and orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:LakersKits2.jpg edit

 

The file File:LakersKits2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Lakerkit2.jpg edit

 

The file File:Lakerkit2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply