Please do not create pointless articles like Nick n. It is considered vandalism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked. --Deskana (talk) 23:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Spicy the dog

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Spicy the dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Lcarscad (talk) 23:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Spicy the dog

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Spicy the dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your note. Specifically, your article was deleted because two editors assessed it and found that it didn't meet our editorial standards for inclusion, principally including our notability policy and our reliable sources policy. As well, there is a very specific criterion that applies here, and it's found at WP:NOT#MEMORIAL -- Wikipedia is not a place to house memorials of your deceased pets or family members. I would recommend that you find some other website to house your writing. I'm sympathetic, but there isn't any way that we can host this article. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply