Theallknowingnbaexpert
The All Knowing Nba Expert
Courtney Lee's jersey #
editJust wondering, what is your source regarding Lee's jersey number? Editors are constantly changing it, and I've yet to see a good source on the matter. Thanks, Zagalejo^^^ 04:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, the Wikipedia roster box wouldn't count as a reliable source. It seems that the #41 was simply added by some drive-by IP editor. And the Nets website doesn't clearly say anything, as far as I can tell. (There is this page, which seems to show Lee in a #6 jersey, but I'd prefer to wait until NBA.com actually added a number to his profile.)
- If you do come across a good source that mentions Lee's jersey number, be sure to let me know! Zagalejo^^^ 18:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Bucks-Raptors trade
editPer WP:CRYSTAL, we don't overhaul articles for a roster change, until the transaction has been officially completed. The deal is stil contingent on Delfino from Argentina to North America to sign a contract. Thanks. --Madchester (talk) 21:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Again, please don't overhaul an article until the deal has been officially announced. Thanks. --Madchester (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Fred Christ
editJust wondering, what is your source for [1]? Those stats aren't supported by basketball-reference.com, and I can't see any confirmation that he dislocated his leg. Thanks, Zagalejo^^^ 18:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
"nerd" replies
editHi sir. Yes, you right about that I'm some kind of nerd. But I believe I have my excuses. I'm still a student at university, during semesters I get extremely bored because of extensive lectures, midterms etc. Now I'm in holiday, and these kind of "odd" edits make me relax... somehow. Actually I have a well-used draft for transactions, that makes it easier.
About crappy players I should say something. People generally care about the major parts of transactions (which is not that weird), but minor parts are overlooked. They also have articles, and somebody has to take care of their pages. So, apparently, that's me.
I still cannot use the preview button regularly, that's why you see some edits twice in 3 seconds. Take care, sir. -Tamburello (talk) 07:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Sir, I have no doubt about your good will. I'm aware of that, after my school begins, I'll quit indefinitely, or show up rarely... Thanks...
Your recent edits
editHello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Your reference at Megafault doesn't point to anywhere. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I removed unsourced claims. If you can find sources, then I'll put them back. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I never said it wasn't a real movie, if it was, I would have nominated it for deletion. I removed claims you put into the article which you did not source. Please see WP:V. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Megafault. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:46, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Can you please rewrite it, especially the intro because to be honest, it's nothing like an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a place for opinions or what fans think- it is for straightforward facts. I want to copyedit the article, but it's very difficult to know what you're trying to say and what to take out. Additionally, WP:Neutral point of view is significantly violated in that article. I've gone ahead and taken out some of the bias but it's really hard for me to do that here. -Tommy! [message] 16:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)