Crosses

edit

Please do not add crosses to characters in cast sections, if you want to show that a character is dead then write it--Jac16888 Talk 21:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Again, please stop--Jac16888 Talk 02:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Look, you have to stop adding †'s to articles. Its not how we show a character is dead, you should write either alongside the character, or else in a prose plot section--Jac16888 Talk 21:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
No, its not. Using crosses is like a memorial, and its not how we do things. If a character is dead and you want noted, we use text, not symbols--Jac16888 Talk 02:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Jac16888 Talk 09:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Just stop it alright. Its disruptive and very annoying--Jac16888 Talk 22:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
And RIP is just as bad. You need to realise that they are fictional characters and that this is not a memorial site or anything like that.--Jac16888 Talk 22:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Seriously? You think smaller crosses are any better than large ones? I know you speak English so stop ignoring me--Jac16888 Talk 22:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
You're kidding right? "DEAD"? Have you not seen that in the next box across it already says that the character is dead? Which is how its supposed to be--Jac16888 Talk 22:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. When you recently edited Televicentro (Canal 2), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages White Collar and Passione (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2012

edit

El Talismán

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to El Talismán. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Platinum Star (talk) 07:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited El Talismán, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply