Please add your comments below: edit

Your rollback request edit

Hello The Wiki Octopus, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 17:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Careful with that new Rollback button! edit

Hi - you are probably already be aware of it, but your recent rollback at the Daniel Radcliffe article did not probably accomplish the desired result. You apparently tried to roll back two edit levels, and it had the effect of restoring the vandalism / sandboxing that had been previously reverted by another user Enzo Aquarius. I think you were attempting to roll back the two anonymous sandbox/vandalism edits by anonymous IP user 67.80.254.73, which had already been rolled back by Enzo Aquarius. We know you didn't mean to do it, but just please be very careful with the rollback button and make sure of what exactly you are rolling back. Otherwise someone might inadvertently and incorrectly assume you might be engaging in vandalism yourself, or worse, using the Rollback feature to edit-war with someone. One of the disadvantages of Rollback is that it there is no Preview or Show Changes - it is instantaneous, which is one reason why it is reserved for highly experienced and trusted editors. Anyway it was not a big deal in this particular case - the error was quickly fixed (as it always is); but the point is we all need to be very careful with the special tools we have been given. Thanks for your attention, and Thank You for supporting the Project and the anti-vandalism efforts. --T-dot ( Talk/contribs ) 01:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Lil Wayne. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply