TheTruth0416
May 2022
edit
Hello, I'm The C of E. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Roger McMurrin that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 16:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Roger McMurrin. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Le Marteau (talk) 12:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Roger McMurrin, you may be blocked from editing. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Please note that the reason why your edits were reverted (undone), and why you were blocked for repeatedly adding this material back, was because your actions constituted a serious violation of Wikipedia's "biographies of living persons" policy. Per the BLP policy, contentious material about living persons must be supported by inline citations to reliable, published sources. The fact that a contentious claim is true (or that you are convinced that it is true) is not good enough to justify its inclusion unless you can back it up with a suitable source. And even if you do have a published source for your claim, you need to make sure it is a reliable source (see the content guideline dealing with reliable sources). — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 07:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)