Comment

edit

Thanks for your contributions. I will suggest it is best to cite your sources including a link to the source. This can be done automatically in visual editor, by using the URL or DOI url and the citation will auto complete.

Also keep in mind that Wikipedia is based upon independent secondary sources: this means academic reviews, meta analyses, expert written books, etc rather than primary source studies (which may be prone to methodological issues). Zenomonoz (talk) 04:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit: I see you did add a DOI link on one of them, which I missed. Aim to do this for all the sources. If it doesn't have a DOI just use the URL parameter. Zenomonoz (talk) 04:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for telling me about linking, I'll go through all my recent contributions and add the relevant DOI/link. Could you provide an example that warrants why I might need a reminder about Wikipedia's reliance on "independent secondary sources"? All the studies I have cited are from peer-reviewed journals, otherwise made clear as with the New Scientist magazine (which isn't primary). I can't find any instances of me using primary source studies. TheSpacebook (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply