User talk:TheImaCow/Archive/2021/February

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jdwest32 in topic Tech News: 2021-05

De La Salle College Dundalk

What are you doing? Did you even read the content you restored? It's completely unsourced, and the content would not be appropriate even if it were sourced. Wikipedia doesn't cover students' complaining about how they don't like the results of the student council election. Meters (talk) 06:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Meters: No, I haven't. It happens quite often that I see such removals of the "controversy section", and so far it has always been unjustified. Here I only saw the "Controversies" heading and then immediately reverted - my mistake. I will now look more carefully, thanks for pointing it out! --TheImaCow (talk) 06:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
You should never be restoring material without looking at the content. Meters (talk) 06:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, thats true. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Prodding images that were wikilinked from archived discussions

Hi, you recently prodded File:Horizontal list in IE6.png. This image was part of an archived discussion from 2007 about updating the CSS code that powers Wikpiedia (we wanted to make sure that it would work correctly on IE6, which was commonly used at the time). I've edited that information onto the image description page.

I'm not sure what the policy is (or if there even is a policy) about whether images used by old archived discussions should be deleted, but because we're preserving the discussions from 2007 themselves, my guess is that we should probably be preserving the images that are part of them too.

My main concern, though, is that the image seems to have been incorrectly detected as unused when it wasn't. The issue is that the image was linked from the discussion using a wikilink (like the one in the first paragraph of this message), rather than a file link (which would embed the image directly onto the page). I'm not sure whether it's a human or bot that's making this error, but it's something that probably ought to be checked before deleting images. (You can see the list of incoming wikilinks, as opposed to file links, via the "what links here" option on the page tools; many of them will be discussions about the image, such as this one, but some of them may be uses of the image which linked rather than thumbnailed them in order to save space.) My main worry is that blindly deleting this sort of image is likely to lead to link rot in the archives of project pages and project discussion pages, because whatever tools are detecting unused images seem to have false positives in this respect. --ais523 22:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

It looks like the other image of mine you prodded is also being used via wikilink: User:Penubag/optimum toolsets#monobook (I missed this first time I checked). This is being used in someone else's userspace, so I don't personally have any opinion on what to do about it; maybe it would make sense to notify them (or just remove the prod). --ais523 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Oh. That's not good. I went through the category and decided for each image: Move to Commons or Delete? The tag {{Orphan image}}, which adds images to the category, is mostly placed by bots, and I thought that if there are any links, the tag will not be added. I already assumed that the image was once used in a discussion, which was then deleted. I did not expect that there may still be links to the images, however. I also de-prod'ded the other image. Thanks for pointing this out! --TheImaCow (talk) 07:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-05

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

please go back to my page. dont know why you deleted my content. not enough detail, thank you JayDub (talk) 01:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)