Cossus and new Article

edit

Hey! I would just like to jump by your talk page and say good jobb with your article on Aulus Cornelius Cossus Arvina! We need more articles on the early and middle republican consuls! Much appreciated! Hope you have a fun time making articles and editing, together we can fill this consular fasti! I hope my edits on the page did not seem out of place. CutieyKing (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for the kind words, it is always encouraging to read such things when you're just starting out. Making that article has been quite interesting and informative experience and I have plans of making further articles for other consuls of the period. As for your edits, they add quite a lot and were a definite improvement to a lot of the things I had at first, thank you for those they are well appreciated

TheConsulofRome (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Publius Cornelius Cossus Arvina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucius Postumius Megellus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaius Sulpicius Peticus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tivoli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quintus Servilius Priscus Fidenas (consular tribune 402 BC) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Quintus Servilius Priscus Fidenas (consular tribune 402 BC), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from secondary reliable, independent sources, not just Livy , which is a primary source of sometimes dubious accuracy and historicity, especially for the earlier years of rome;. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 07:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quintus Servilius Fidenas has been accepted

edit
 
Quintus Servilius Fidenas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply