October 2011

edit

  Hello TheCbK. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Cameron Scott (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


What happened to the other guy assigned to the article? --Cameron Scott (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

What other guy? Yes I have affiliation but I am not trying to be biased. I'm very very neutral. I'm fine with many of the edits you have made, but I think the article would read much better with a lawsuits section. I can site many other Wiki pages that follow the same format. I posted something the other day and you cleaned it up. Thank you! I am not against you.

TheCbK (talk) 21:30, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The other wedbush employee tasked to change the page. If I get the IP addresses checked, they aren't going to resolve to the same one are they? because that would lead to an instant block of both accounts. If that is the case, best to make a declaration first. --Cameron Scott (talk) 07:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cameron. I am not trying to hide anything. I am completely transparent. I am the only one. I was using the account ZigglerD but I lost the login information. It wasn't attached to an email, so I signed up for this one. I don't mean to break any rules or work against you guys. I appreciate you letting me know what's right and what is wrong. I want to work with you. You are the expert. TheCbK (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for clearing that up. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

If I can recover the password from the other one, I'll gladly delete this. Just so you know, I'm not and will never try to "pull a fast one" on you. As I said, I've got nothing but respect.

TheCbK (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's not a problem, I'm not actually telling you as a warning as such, as you've been open about the matter - you might as well stick to this account. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply