TheBronzeMex
NIN
editHey there, I don't think I've interacted with you before but I just wanted to drop a quick thank you for your helpful and constructive editing around Nine Inch Nails and related pages. Your work is appreciated! --Laser brain (talk) 16:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers man! --TheBronzeMex (talk) 17:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Musical artist navboxes.
editPlease stop splitting the singles by album. This makes navboxes way too vertical, and readers are better served by seeing one chronological succession of singles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please also note that your wholesale reverts are also reinstating a lot of other inappropriate links to the navboxes. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- You also seem to be adding links to films on which the artists have appeared in or have had songs on the soundtracks. Please note that per WP:FILMNAV these are not acceptable. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- I will budge on the soundtracks for now, but I will not on splitting the singles. It is a quicker and easier way to access articles from the navbox and is much easier on the eyes. The navbox, as I understand it, is for navigational purposes; this is an aid to that purpose. I will revert the changes to the singles but I'll remove inappropriate links as you've stated. --TheBronzeMex (talk) 11:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- This is just your opinion. The singles should not be split as it splits the chronology, which is how readers will expect to see this information. It is also not easier on the eye as it makes the navbox too vertical. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- "Just your opinion" is not a satisfactory argument. I could easily say how you expect readers to see information as "just your opinion", but this is about the ease of use of the navbox and its presentation. Splitting the singles serves both needs; it's easier to read and therefore easier to access. --TheBronzeMex (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Let's get wider input. Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Best practice for singles chronologies in musical artist navboxes. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, hopefully we'll be able to come to some sort of consensus. --TheBronzeMex (talk) 11:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Let's get wider input. Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Best practice for singles chronologies in musical artist navboxes. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- "Just your opinion" is not a satisfactory argument. I could easily say how you expect readers to see information as "just your opinion", but this is about the ease of use of the navbox and its presentation. Splitting the singles serves both needs; it's easier to read and therefore easier to access. --TheBronzeMex (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- This is just your opinion. The singles should not be split as it splits the chronology, which is how readers will expect to see this information. It is also not easier on the eye as it makes the navbox too vertical. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- I will budge on the soundtracks for now, but I will not on splitting the singles. It is a quicker and easier way to access articles from the navbox and is much easier on the eyes. The navbox, as I understand it, is for navigational purposes; this is an aid to that purpose. I will revert the changes to the singles but I'll remove inappropriate links as you've stated. --TheBronzeMex (talk) 11:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, TheBronzeMex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)