ThatsHowIRoll
Cool pic
editGood luck to your team tomorrow as well. I'm neutral and am definitely going to enjoy this one. Go Big Orange! Clinevol98 04:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
re: image
editWe try to use free images whenever possible (as people mirror Wikipedia for commercial purposes, among other things), and really should only use fair use ones when there's no free alternative available. I think at the very least both images should be in the article. --W.marsh 22:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
WM 23
editMy bad, I just looked at your edit summary and assumed you had switch Vince and Donald. Normally I don't do that. TJ Spyke 02:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- The old poster was not on the WWE Affiliates site. The current one is the one used by WWE. TJ Spyke 22:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- No, the WWE poster just had a big red bar that said "LIVE ON PAY-PER-VIEW". It didn't have the TV rating or info like that. TJ Spyke 23:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I went back and got the poster used at WWE Affiliates, and just cropped it (which is not against copyright laws) instead. TJ Spyke 23:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I won't revert it. You won't report me, will you? I can't afford another block. TJ Spyke 23:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I just went back and counted, i've only done 2 reverts (the others were removing vandalism. Another reason to use the picture that WWE released (i.e. mine) is that the pic you uploaded is all pixelated. TJ Spyke 23:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I won't revert it. You won't report me, will you? I can't afford another block. TJ Spyke 23:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I went back and got the poster used at WWE Affiliates, and just cropped it (which is not against copyright laws) instead. TJ Spyke 23:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- No, the WWE poster just had a big red bar that said "LIVE ON PAY-PER-VIEW". It didn't have the TV rating or info like that. TJ Spyke 23:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)