Hi ThatHatCat. I'm assuming you're a new editor so, welcome. Because of your edits to Covert United States foreign regime change actions I'm not sure you understand what does and does not qualify as a reliable source. After reading this linked policy page if you have any further questions or need help locating a reliable source please let me know, I'd be glad to help if I can. TomPointTwo (talk) 02:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Hi TomPointTwo, Many thanks for the offer of help on adding a valid Mexico category to Covert United States Foreign Regime Change Actions. My short contribution has been taken down twice today. Clearly I don't understand what constitutes a valid citation. The category says that it needs further development; Mexico is a glaring omission. I spent several hours developing a short lead that enables someone to follow the facts. If the trolls attempting to whitewash history want to persist in their games, I will fold. Newspeak abounds. Mexicans know their own history; but "Americans" want to conceal theirs. Why? ¶ I see "citation needed" all the time on this site. When I tried to supply one, I got savaged. Why did I waste my time? If someone has a better citation, let them substitute for what I found; in the meantime I'll attempt to make a difference on the ground, in community, rather than in cyberspace. I love Wikipedia, and appreciate mentors, being one myself. The danger of playing with trolls is in becoming one. Not sure I can, or should, go there. Thank you, Sir. ~eric.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~