Minnesota edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! And thank you for your contribution to this article. As you may know, there is an active group of editors who collaberated to bring this article to Featured Article status. We have no no editing disputes to speak of, as we usually discuss matters with each other on the talk page. I have posted on the talk page some questions for others to consider, and one of those involves your recent addition. See Talk:Minnesota#Recent_changes_to_article. Can you weigh in with your thoughts there? Thanks. Kablammo 18:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Earth's revolution edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Earth's revolution, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Earth's revolution. // Chris (complaints)(contribs) 05:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Religious scientists edit

I have nominated Religious scientists, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious scientists. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply