User talk:Tgeorgescu/Archives/2021/August

Concern about your recent edits

Hey Tgeorgescu,

When reading your recent comments on the RSN, it seemed to be very worrisome because in one of your edits[1] you appeared to believe that it is fine to say that "according to Haaretz Haredi Judaism is a dangerous and radical new cult". More worrisome edits of yours followed in which you appeared to claim that Haredi Judaism is "Fundamentalist"[2] and deserves being criticized with the terms dangerous and radical new cult[3]. It seems that this is getting into WP:NONAZIS territory. Can you please explain yourself?155.246.151.38 (talk) 19:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Yada, yada, so according to you everyone who criticizes the Haredi is a neo-Nazi or a self-hating Jew. Especially if published in Haaretz. How preposterous!

You may look at https://www.britannica.com/topic/fundamentalism/The-Haredim . It is under Jewish fundamentalism in Israel. You're fooling no one!

I mean, give me a break! This "new" guy is all over the place, canvassing, edit warring, even coming here to RSN (no less!), and calling it "Anti-Semitism"!? The gall! Just look at the latest edit warring on clearly religious fundamentalist issues here and here. I'd urge admins to block this in a jiff, because this guy is not "new" at all, just a new religious fundamentalist sock-puppet, in my view. warshy ^(¥¥) 21:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Quoted by tgeorgescu (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Opinons on Abraham

If main stream bible researchers have concluded that Arbraham is a literary figure, instead of a historic one, then the reader of the article should be confronted with that fact in the very first sentence according to WP:lede ("The notability of the article's subject is usually established in the first few sentences."). By pushing the histrocity into the 3rd paragraph we are guarenteeing that any human searching for Abraham will not read anything about his failed historicty because only the 1st 3 sentences are shown in the search result This is the summary contract Wikipedia has with most search engines. We are censoring this article to the rest of the internet by refusing to acknowledge the historicity question in the 1st three sentences as WP:lede orders. If you do not believe me then do a Google search on Abraham and see the promoted Wikipedia result for yourself. This is all I see:

"Abraham was the unhistoric, common patriarch of the Abrahamic religions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. In Judaism, he was the founding father of the covenant of the pieces, the special relationship between the Hebrews and God; in Christianity, he was the spiritual progenitor of all believers, Jewish or Gentile; and in Islam he is seen as a link in the chain of prophets that begins with Adam and culminates in Muhammad."

If consensus is that Abraham is a literary figure then the ENTIRE article needs to reflect that viewpoint and every instance where the article reads as if Abraham is an actual person to be qualified with 'according to the bible,' or 'from Islamic tradition,'.

The search engine comes back with "Resting place: Cave of Machpelah". How can a literary figure, which never had a physical body, have a resting place? Again, the consensus of mainstream biblical scholars is he was not a real person than we need to remove ridiculous, unsourced claims that he has a burial place or an actual birthdate.

I know this is a hard pull because many of the users editing this page are paid contributors (either directly or by virtue of being a rabbi, minister, imam or other religious staff member, employed by their membership, and seeing Wikipedia editing as part of their mission), but I believe in following Wikipedia standards despite being put up against the paid editing crowd. If I was paid then you'd see me editing daily. Alatari (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your name is Adolf Hitler. Yimach Shimecha. You write: "This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Yahwism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)."

You vandalized Hashem's name. Hashemism is your invention to desecrate the Name of Hashem which you wrote in vain. It's really pronounced the way the J witnesses say it except the J is replaced with a Y. But we don't pronounce it at all. We say Hashem which means The Name. You commit blasphemy against His Name. He will punish your for your Anti-Semitic article about a theory as if it was fact. Leftists are Nazis that don't know that the neutral way to write without taking sides is to give both sides. For example, the Jewish side would be that G-d created the World and is One. Your side would be that you claim people created Him (R"L) and that only you have the authority to say what belief in Him is. That's because you are Adolf Hitler. Yesh"u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.77.253 (talk • contribs)

Stating that Baruch Halpern, Richard Elliott Friedman, and Shaye J. D. Cohen write Nazi Hitlerist theories is bigoted trolling.

You're writing pretty much in the spirit of that clown who accused me of antisemitism because I have denied the historical existence of Noah. If there is still any doubt: millions of secular Jews would gladly deny the historical reality of Noah. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)