Advanced Fee Fraud

edit

Well I didn't write that paragraph, so I have no say in what is written there. Instead, you or whomever is using that IP address continues to remove that section without so much as an edit summary explaining as to why he or she objects to its placement. Under the book that counts as vandalism (anonymous user constantly removing section with no explanation), and thus I restore it accordingly. Perhaps while removing it, you should add a summary to the talk page or to at least the edit summaries section explianing why it is inappropriate or biased, then other users and I will stop removing it, or someone who objects to its removal can argue against it; this will avoid a revert war. For now, the removal just looks like a vandal blanking pages, though don't think I'm calling you a vandal, it just seems like it because there is no indication otherwise. As you can see in the history section, I am not the only one who has restored it. I have just been the most recent one, and if I stop and let it be without an explanation, someone else will come along and add it back again, so it's best to go ahead and add an edit summary to the talk page. Still, the portion of the paragraph which states that most words are Igbo in origin should remain, as it is generally proven as such in the jargon section. I'm sincerly sorry if I inconvinienced you or insulted you by continuing to add it back, but I'm just working by the guidelines. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 21:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)Reply