Tarebcphae27
Joined 13 April 2023
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ponyo in topic April 2023
April 2023
edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 10:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- This account didn’t abuse Wikipedia’s rules. This account has made just only 3 edits. Used sourced information. And having good faith. Tarebcphae27 (talk) 11:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Nonsense. See WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. You were not editing in good faith. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Why Tarebcphae27 (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- WP:EVADE, WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Huh Tarebcphae27 (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Did they blocked me by person or the seperate account Tarebcphae27 (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- What led me being blocked indefinitely Tarebcphae27 (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- You've already been directed to appeal via your main account. Talk page access revoked. I suggest you read this page first.-- Ponyobons mots 17:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- What led me being blocked indefinitely Tarebcphae27 (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Did they blocked me by person or the seperate account Tarebcphae27 (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Huh Tarebcphae27 (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- WP:EVADE, WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Why Tarebcphae27 (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Nonsense. See WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. You were not editing in good faith. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)