Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Tanya Reinhart. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 12:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mattityahu Peled. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 12:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tanya Reinhart, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
This piece of vandalism is the same piece of vandalism as User talk:Misses giggles inserted seven times into different articles from 12:41 to 12:45; Misses giggles was warned at 12:46; this account was then opened at 12:48 and carries on where Misses giggles left off. Co-incidence? Bencherlite 13:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)