User talk:Tangotango/December 2006

minor change to template:RfA

Okay, I'll bite. Is there any reason your bot would not be able to handle a change of "Ending" to "Scheduled to end" on Template:RfA? Both WP:WATCH and WP:BN seem to be handling the MrDarcy example fine so far. Crossposted to the other two BotOps mentioned there. -- nae'blis 23:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

hello

I'm sorry for the duplicate vote, vector(simple) --dario vet ^_^ (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

do you now why this edit count is ok....and this no?  :(( --dario vet ^_^ (talk) 09:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Idea for Vote Templates

Hello Tangotango!

Currently, on Meta, people use templates that users place when voting on whatnot to declare their vote. I have created similar "templates" on one of my user pages, but currently these are not mainstream templates (then again they aren't even templates) because I wanted a few Admins to approve them for use on Votes (such as RfAs and other votes). Please see This page for more info.

Booksworm Hello? Anyone home? Vote! Vote! 17:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Please vote!

Hello Tangotango! Wikipedia needs YOU to cast your vote on this FAC. Thanks, Booksworm Hello? Anyone home? Vote! Vote! 17:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Afd

Hello, I was wondering if you would have a second to look over your choice for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolis (Japanese magazine), it not up for deletion over notability but do to the article is mainly an advertisement. It claims its the biggest magazine in Japan by the ABC but because its the only one listed by the ABC they get to claim that; it's a trick a marketing person would pull the article is full of it. Yes, the magazine is notable enough to have an article but we have this deletion criteria for a reason, in this form it should be deleted. --Simonkoldyk 17:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

oppose vote on RfA

The bot does not seem to recognise the oppose !vote on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Agathoclea. Agathoclea 16:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)