Week #2_Tailz88_Article evaluation-_Financial crisis of 2007–2008
edit1. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
A： everything in this article is relevant to the article topic, and nothing really distracted me.
2. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
A: I don't think any information out of data and any missing information could be added so far.
3. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
A: this article is neutral and no claims appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
4. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
A: I checked 10 different citations and everyone works. Those sources do support the claims in the article.
5. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
A: Currently, the conversation behind the scene is about Sovereign European debt, which needs to be added in the financial crisis article.