User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

Use of registered trademarks - PLAYSTATION®Network

Hi there, Sony Computer Entertainment has registered PLAYSTATION for the next generation consoles [1] - there's also an interview with Ken Kutaragi explaining all this in the PlayStation 3 article. I have added these details to the body instead on this page

Hgld 23:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by hgld (talk • contribs)

ECW December to Dismember

Well, I read on one of those backstage wrestling news sites that Hardcore Holly vs. The Sandman had been added to the card. I didn't check WWE.com, I just updated it after I read that. Sorry for the mistake.—Preceding unsigned comment added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs)

Just an angle and nothing to do with TNA?

Well, its just not an angle performed by VKM they were actually making fun of WWE and thats important for the future of the company isnt it? tell me why you deleted it? if what you say is right then i seriously dont mind moving that heading of VKM.

Thank You.—Preceding unsigned comment added by OnceWalker (talk • contribs)

ROH Title

It seems that some editors have gone out of their way to push the ROH title as a recognized world heavyweight title. I have n ever seen anyone list that title as being recognized by anyone other than the fans and the promotion. Do you know anything about its status? youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 15:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

WWE Cyber Sunday

look the poster (wweshop.com)—Preceding unsigned comment added by KingOfDX (talk • contribs)

Your talk page edit to WWE New Year's Revolution

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

As a side note to go with it: your comments on the talk page don't need to be so rude. It's not needed to copy the same thing with your opinion inserted into it. No one is making you post, so how about not posting if you don't agree with comments? The matter is solved, the poster was real. Life goes on. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

WWE Armageddon

Okay, but the Batista/King Booker match from Survivor Series was listed on WWE.com below about 5 matches, but was the main-event of Survivor Series. Explain that to me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs) 22:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC).

Okay, but don't you think a Undertaker/Mr. Kennedy match is bigger than a Kane/MVP match because 1. the Undertaker/Kennedy feud is the bigger of the two and 2. Together, Undertaker and Kennedy are the bigger stars than Kane and MVP.—Preceding unsigned comment added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs)

Whatever, dude. I'm sick of fighting. You obviously will never listen.—Preceding unsigned comment added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs)

Fine, we're not fighting, but I'm sick of talking to you. And who are you to tell me what I can and what I can't post? Do you run that page or something?—Preceding unsigned comment added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs)

There is no policy on the match order (or which wrestler is listed first: except for champions), so it can be done however. There isn't a good reason to make it look like WWE's official site, seeing as how the order will change once the event actually takes place. A WWE upcoming event is not much different than an upcoming movie or video game. All three things are coming out in the future. Look at those articles: they aren't just in the same order that's listed on official sites previewing the movie or game. RobJ1981 19:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

SummerSlam (2007)

That WWE Affiliate website [2] lists the SummerSlam 2007 PPV taking place from the Continental Arena. You might want to edit that on the PPV's page. The login and password can be found on User talk:149.84.147.134. ThatsHowIRoll 00:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. TJ Spyke 00:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

ECW December To Dismember

Can you give me the ECW DTD results? Please KingOfDX 01:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

ECW World Heavyweight Championship or ECW World Championship?

There is an ongoing debate that you might want to take a look at. See Talk:ECW World Heavyweight Championship. Just thought you should know...-- bulletproof ^3:16 03:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

RE: Rated-RKO

I did fix the redirects. I moved the page from Rated RKO to Rated-RKO. Check the redirects for the former, and you'll see no redirect pages. Cheers, -- THLR^CCD 02:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought that only the actual redirect pages needed to be fixed. I'll take care of it now. Cheers, -- THLR^CCD 04:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Your talk page edit to WWE New Year's Revolution

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

As a side note to go with it: your comments on the talk page don't need to be so rude. It's not needed to copy the same thing with your opinion inserted into it. No one is making you post, so how about not posting if you don't agree with comments? The matter is solved, the poster was real. Life goes on. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Your talk page edit to WWE Armageddon

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RobJ1981 04:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Wii article

Hello.
We're currently both at 2 reverts. Regardless, I won't be hitting a third. I wouldn't suggest that you do, either.
But please keep this in mind. I've shown good faith by giving people time to discuss before making the changes.
I've stated that all you need to do is provide a proper citation that Nintendo doesn't know their own intended market.
If you state that it is competing, but Nintendo believes otherwise, then you are conclusively stating that Nintendo is wrong. You need to back that up with a citation.
Forcing uncited and unverifiable statements into an article can never be appropriate. Please stop this immediately. Bladestorm 22:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

It actually isn't fair at all. (don't get me wrong, I appreciate the desire for compromise) You directly state that it is in competition with the 360 and PS3. And then you state that Nintendo doesn't agree. Those statements combine unequivocally state that Nintendo is flat-out wrong about their own market. That must be properly verified and sourced. Otherwise, it's just conjecture, or Original Research. It can't stay in the absence of proper citation. And I honestly can't imagine how you could possibly find a citation directly (and reliably) stating that Nintendo doesn't know what they're doing with the wii.

Think of it this way, it is appealing to a different market. Countless people who have given up on videogames still have interest in the wii. You have to back it up. If you're going to make an assertion that's under dispute, and that directly accuses Nintendo of not knowing their own market, then you need to back it up. Bladestorm 22:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

OH, THAT last compromise. meh. I guess that's fine. Bladestorm 22:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Progress

Hi, I would just like to ask something. I was just wondering, could you give me a basic summery of how I have been doing as an editor and what I can do to improve? Your an experienced editor, so i thought i'd ask you. Killswitch Engage

Other than a few mistakes (which are natural for any new editor), you've done a prett good job. TJ Spyke 02:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Do you have any advice on how I can improve? Answer on talk page. Killswitch P.S. I'm gonna take this oppertunity to apolligise for being an ass early on. I'm really trying to change.

WWE Deaths

I agree that the format might have been wrong with many of the wrestlers having not been in the WWE, but I think some type of article should be written on the many premature deaths with pro-wrestlers and drug use. I see that you have more experience in these matters and ask you to think about the format or perhaps creation of such an article, thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.167.255.231 (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC).

WWE Armageddon 2006

Update please!. KingOfDX 03:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

In case you didn't see it (what I posted on the talk page): "I don't see that as much of a compromise: seeing as how when matches are announced, that's how they are listed on WWE and TNA websites (with the main event being the only exception to that alot of the time). But I will agree to it, as long as it works for all PPV pages. It's a start at least, but I still think something new should be figured out for PPV pages as a Wrestling Project policy of some sort."

So as long as that's agreed to, the page should be unprotected as soon as it can. That way people can stop complaining about not updating. Even though it's not a big deal either way, Wikipedia isn't the only site on the internet for information. People really need to be calm about protection, and not overreact so much on the talk page. RobJ1981 18:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Wii Controversy

Why is it reverted? There are legal issues with the Wii, even much before its launch. Frankyboy5 22:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Virtual Console "Official Logo"

Why did you repost the logo and caption? That is not the Official logo for the Virtual Console page? whoever put it up there just went to the wii.com virtual console page and copied a banner onto the main page! That isn't its logo! Mike24 05:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

GT Cube/GT Pro Series merge

Hi, I responded to your own response on Talk:GT Cube a few days ago. Just notifying you of this so you can respond again and we can hopefully come to an agreement/consensus (if it can even be called a consensus with just two people). Thanks, Nova Prime 06:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Unforgiven 2002...

Any reason why did you deleted my edit? That is a fact, though, haven't you seen the PPV? Taker did threw Lesnar through the Unforgiven logo...--Dekabreak101 19:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:

I think he should be included if he actually won the title. Why doesn't WWE recognize him as a champion in the first place? --  Mikedk9109  (hit me up)  22:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

WWE Triple Crown

User:Moe Epsilon, who quit Wikipedia immediately after, told me that the US Championship doesn't count towards a Triple Crown, but the IC does. Is this true? Cheers, -- THLR 01:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

He thinks it doesn't, I think it does. The truth is that we don't know for sure one way or the other. TJ Spyke 01:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I always thought that it did as well. What should we do about the Triple Crown article? Last time I looked, it doesn't have the US title in the table. Cheers, -- THLR 04:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Feuds

Says who?

WP is not a wrestling website. This has been discussed before by WP:PW. It's usually only mentioned in a PPV article if it was major (check the WrestleMania XX article for an example). TJ Spyke 22:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Not this again

As I read a Raw report (since I didn't see the show), I saw no references to matches announced for New Year's Revolution. Why did you agree to that compromise if the match order is staying the same way it always has? It's an exact copy of WWE.com. I realize the website announces matches before they do on TV sometimes, but this is going against the compromise either way. Unless I see proof they announced it on TV in that order, the page should probably be protected. Compromising, then going against it... is just unacceptable. The compromise wasn't just for Armageddon, and I clearly said it should be for all PPV pages. Agreement was reached I thought, but I guess not. RobJ1981 05:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

As a side note: I re-read what you posted on the talk page... it was about when the matches were announced, but nothing to do with TV or website. So the compromise was basically a trick to keep it the same? I don't appreciate that. If I need to get several pages protected due to this, I guess I will need to. There is simply no excuse for this. A WWE copy is pointless, and people can see wwe.com for that preview, not Wikipedia. Considering matches are confirmed on the website first, that order will usually dominate the article then. That is not how things should happen... again. RobJ1981 05:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Get the pages protected? You seem to be the one who wants to control the articles. Whoever gave you that RAW report was wrong because 2 matches were announced on RAW tonight (the tag match and the IC Title match). Listing matches in the order they are made official is the most NPOV stance, and I don't understand how you can't see that. Also, most WWE matches are announced on TV first, it's TNA that usually announced most matches online first. TJ Spyke 05:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I would appreciate it

if, should you stumble across a nomination of mine in the future, that you not accuse me of bad faith. I explained more than once in the nomination why I made it, and the nomination was made for exactly the reasons I stated. Maintaining civility requires that I not specify exactly which of your bodily orifices I would like you to cram your bullshit accusation into, so I'll leave it at that. Otto4711 16:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The Miz

WWE.com states his name as Mike "The Miz" Mizanin [3] and the PPV preview lists the match as The Miz vs The Boogeyman [4] For what reason should it not be listed that way? ThatsHowIRoll 22:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

LOL!

TJ, this quote by you made me laugh: "rude IP was too lazy to find this himself" Ok, so I was rude for not finding a link...... Which makes zero sense. Do you see a link on every single fact for every single article on this site? Things such as the rating for a game usually doesn't have a link. Looks to me like you just want to chose a random reason to pick a fight with random people on the internet. Don't please.63.227.1.55 07:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

WWE Tribute to the Troops

A few days ago, I nominated this article (WWE TTTT) for deletion. Most people have said delete. However, I am really struggling to delete the article. Can you do this for me? Yesterday, also I nominated RAW is Owen for deletion along with WWE Global Warning Tour. Could you delete these when the five day period has expired - that is if the result is delete. Many thanks. Davnel03 17:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

TNA Pay-Per-View's

Sorry to bother you again, but I have a proposal for the TNA pay-per-views, so they look more like the WWE Pay-Per-View articles. WWE Pay-Per-View articles, for instance have all the WWE No Way Out's together and all the WWE Vengeance's together, so is there any way you could put all the TNA PPV's into one?

E.G.:

• TNA Final Resolutions all in one article
• TNA Genesis in a seperate article.

If this occurs with all Pay-Per-View's, it would look more like the traditional way, like what it is like for WWE, ECW + WCW PPV's

Many thanks. Reply on my talk page, under the heading User:TJSpyke. Sorry again to bother you, but this needed to be brought to your attention. Davnel03 18:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• • • I've put a poll on the Wikipedia professional wrestling page at this link. Davnel0309:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Battle Network pages

Hi there. This message is meant to open a discussion regarding the Battle Network pages which A Man In Black and myself are concerned with. Your edits to all the articles within the Battle Network universe (moving pages, altering the templates, etc. that separate "MegaMan" into two words) are causing widespread redirect/linking problems throughout all the articles, causing a total mess to formatting. While I see that your view on the matter is valid, and you may have official sources to back it up, the bottom line is that your recent changes have/still are severely compromising the connections between articles/the consistency between articles, etc. Please reply on my talk page (I will create a heading in which this can be discussed), so that we can come to a consensus on the matter, upon which time admin A Man In Black can begin restoration and repairs of the damage. --Benten 03:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

• Received your message. Thought I'd reply here, just to make sure you get this. I am fine with the titles of the games being spelt as two words ("Mega Man"), but if we change this, I would like the anime article to remain the same (as English episode titles spell it "MegaMan"), as well as the character names themselves (this is a pretty obvious one, but I'd thought I'd mention it anyways). I will inform A Man In Black that a consensus has been reached, and start changing the title text within articles myself. --Benten 22:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

• Hi again. I've completed the changes to the character pages/anime page/character list page so that references to the game continuum are spelt as "Mega Man", and all anime/manga instances as one word as it was agreed. I've moved the first game's article back to the "Mega Man" title, as well as the character list's title, but the other games that still need to be moved I've left for A Man In Black. It would be very helpful, however, if you could go through all the game pages and make sure there are no 'REDIRECT' notices at the bottom of the pages though and to get remove the general template on each page in favour for the one Battle Network specific template (I've already fixed both the general Mega Man game template and Battle Network template, but there may be small things that need changing within the articles, in addition to the text within them.) Thanks a lot. --Benten 23:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

"the biggest Nintendo devoted website?"

I would like to point out that IGN and GameSpot must have 10 times the readership, at the least, of Nintendo World Report. just because it's the biggest Nintendo-only site means nothing. if I have the biggest pink bottle-cap collecting site, does that mean anything special? no. Scepia 06:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Your analogy is off. A more apt comparison would be saying you had the biggest site devoted to a TV show or movie franchise. TJ Spyke 06:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Your Edit Userbox

Just so you know, I got bored and started messing around with Interiot's tool. You have over 15,000 edits. I just thought I would let you know in case you wanted to update your box. Cheers, -- THL 02:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I stopped checking after 10,000. TJ Spyke 02:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocking PPV's

I noticed that you disliked the idea of blocking PPV's a month before the event, as you put under my poll on the professional wrestling project page. I put this as an idea, as I noticed a growing trend, in the past few months of vandals trying to write matches that haven't been announced. Also, would this (what I suggested on the professional wrestling talk page) be against Wikipedia policies? Reply, many thanks. Davnel03 21:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

WWE Harcore Women's Championship

Hey lad. There was a page created of this "title" created to support the vandalism in the New Year's Revolution page. Take a look a it, for a deletion issue. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xbox6 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC).

Pokemon move

You didn't complete the move request since you forgot to set up the discussion at Chatot. I've done it for you. TJ Spyke 04:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I didn’t forget at all. I had placed the move request under Uncontroversial proposals. Requests in that section are explicitly exempt from the need to place the template on the talk page. --WikidSmaht (talk) 05:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

RAW Set

You changed the caption for the picture of the RAW set on the RAW page back to 2005-present, and said in your comment for the edit that they added the monitors on the side of the Titanitron. Could you show what you mean in the picture given, because I don't see them. I could be just blind, but I don't see them. Anakinjmt 01:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

My Name

I have to agree with Quatreryukami ... sort of. If the game is bundled with the system and not offered separately, it winds up the most-selling game almost by default, so on the one hand, the comparison isn't really valid to begin with, but on the other hand, you do wind up with a lot of people owning a copy of the game. --Stratadrake 01:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

LOL !!!!! thx for backup... sort ofQuatreryukami 20:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Adventure Gamers AfD

(Note: I have no opinion on the web site, as I have never seen it.) You stated in the AfD: "Metacritic and Game Rankings accept reviews from any website or magazine that is professional, regardless of notability." Though you !voted keep nonetheless, I would simply like to point out that this is not true for Metacritic. Only selected publications are used to calculate the Metascore for a game/film/CD/etc. For example, my local paper, The Star-Ledger, is one of the dozen most highly circulated papers in America, and Rotten Tomatoes counts its film critics in its "Cream of the Crop" scoring, but Metacritic does not use the Ledger for calculating its film Metascores (though, oddly, does use the Ledger for TV reviews). This really does not matter much, but for some reason, it was bugging me. Cheers. -- Kicking222 02:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I should add that Metacritic does count scores from a megaton of gaming publications, but to be fair, I'm sure there are also many sources of gaming reviews that Metacritic does not use. -- Kicking222 02:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Help

I'm the logged out User:The Hybrid. I f***ed up my skin trying to get a new anti-vandal tool, and now whenever I try to log in or fix it logged out my computer freezes. Could you blank User:The Hybrid/monobook.js please. I'll return the favor however you want. Please tell me on my IP talk page if you do this. Cheers, 71.223.40.167 08:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Alright, thanks anyway. 71.223.40.167 08:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm back. -- THL 10:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Using just a period (or comma, question mark, etc) isn't a good enough summary. Minor edit or not, what was changed to article should be listed to some degree rather than just one small period or comma or question mark. RobJ1981 02:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:HouseCharacter

Template:HouseCharacter has been nominated for deletion for similar reasons for The Bill character template (for which you voted delete). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. The JPS^{talk to me} 13:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Wii Play

Hi, please can you not revert my change from the European box art back to the North American box art, there is absolutely no need for this. This is the English language wikipedia, not the american wikipedia, and so views of all regions should be treated equally. The European box art should remain for three reasons, 1. It was there first, there is nothing wrong with the image and there is no need to change it. 2. The game was released in PAL regions first and so it makes sense that this is the box art that should be in the article, and 3. The game is not even going to be released in North America for nearly 2 months so why have an unreleased box art that may change rather than one that has been around for weeks. Thank you. Timkovski 01:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)