User talk:TJ.Jang/sandbox

Rebecca's Peer Review

The leading part is clear. You could delete the content in parentheses. Compared to the original page, it has more supplementary informations and strong structures. I would like to add a section about the applications of this reaction at the end. Also the heading should be more "short" and organized, which will make the wikipedia page more easy to read and understand. You could also provide the pictures of reactions, and also mechanism to help to explain how it happens. The content is neutral and resources are reliable. It's a good work! Rebecca ttt (talk) 05:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

TJ.Jang response

1) I agree. I need to show the application of this reaction, but I'm still thinking that it should be part of the list of reactions. I will change the "application part" to whole another chapter if I feel that the list of reaction parts get too long.

2) Yes, I need to show the reaction with structural formula, but they are already listed at the each independent Wikipedia pages. So if I reuse these pictures, it will look like self-plagiarism of the wiki page. I may give a brief description of reaction and link to each reaction. Meanwhile, I'd like to give a detailed description and chemical equation for the reactions which do not have independent pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ.Jang (talk • contribs) 18:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)