July 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Speak Now. Block evasion, genre warring.

There is no source supporting country as a genre. Bjork138 (talk) 01:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

1. I'm not block evading anything. Which, oddly enough, is something that you've also been accused of.
2. You can't call my edit (which is simply reverting back to before the nonsense like punk rock) an invalid edit.
3. It's one thing to put the hidden note, but the addition of "like country" is uncalled for - which, by the way, was the reason for the revert.
4. You seem to be having this same debate on multiple pages.
4a. Because you are discussing this on more than one page, is there any chance that you have this album confused with one of the others? This is 'Speak Now', not 'Red'.

Regardless, I've reverted it back. Back to the way it was 3 days ago before you removed it. Back to where it was a week ago. Back to where it was two months ago. Back to where it was a year ago. Swimsnunki (talk) 04:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
The way it was, was always country pop, pop rock. The thing is, there is no source supporting country as a genre on the album. If there was, I'd be the first one to add it but there is only support for country pop, not country. Bjork138 (talk) 13:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
1. In the last 100 edits, I recognize a couple editors as being what I consider 'senior editors'. You know, the people not to cross because they are quick to block or people who's edits are always given 'more weight' in debates. They seem to be editing in the manner of 'country'. So, I will concur.
2. If you click on this [[1]], you'll see the funniest thing. It's you, reverting someone's genre edit, putting 'country' back in. Or look at these [[2]], [[3]], and [[4]]. All your edits with 'country' as the genre.

I believe that is what the kids call a mic drop. Boom.
Swimsnunki (talk) 14:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply