Sweetheart2009

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Don't Forget are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. NrDg 00:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Sweetheart2009

Hey I am sweetheart2009 I wanted to give my special thanks to people I wish I could get this on the main page.Thanks to my folks my friends and the love of my life people who are on here please put your coments on the talk page--Sweetheart2009 (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)sweetheart2009

No chat on talk pages

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Taylor Swift for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Polite warning

Hi. I do anti-vandalism work. Although it's obvious your comments are in "good faith" as we call it, there is a issue with them, so I thought I would take a minute to explain. Two editors noted the issue, above, and your recent addition to the Keke Palmer discussion was just deleted by an experienced Wiki editor: [1].

The deal is that you need to "get in tune" with the concept of Wikipedia being an encyclopedia. Obviously the main articles aren't the place for "So-and-so is so great!" comments, but it's less obvious that the discussion pages aren't the place for those comments, either. The best Wiki material comes from *reliable*, *independent*, *third-party* sources. Such as published books, and important magazines, or newspapers e.g. The New York Times, or the London Times. That means largely that Wiki wants your help about finding those sources. See WP:V about this. For every person who likes Keke Palmer, there's probably another one who hates her work. So noting that you like her doesn't really say anything that people don't know already.

When you make a lot of edits in Wikipedia that cause editors to give you warnings, or which are immediately erased, it's a sign that you are not on track with the purpose of Wikipedia. I know you are doing these edits with the best of intentions, but if you don't pay attention to what editors are telling you, and you ignore the rules, soon you will be given other warnings. Eventually you might be labeled as a vandal, and blocked from editing. So, keep up the enthusiasm, and help Wikipedia out by reading the guidelines, and researching your contributions! Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 18:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Robert Pattinson for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. Your only edits so far are to talk pages where you do not contribute in any way to the improvement of the articles. Wiki is not a social network and is not a fan site. If this continues you will eventually get blocked. Please try to contribute to the improvement of this encylopedia. NrDg 18:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I clicked on the new heading thing.what was wrong with the robert artical? I was just stating the facts he was a hand model.The looks section should be deleted wether or not he is good looking or not has nothing to do with his acting,singing modeling or whatever.--Sweetheart2009 (talk) 00:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)sweetheart2009

The purpose of the article discussion page is to talk about ways to improve the article. That is all that is permitted there. Adding information or opinions in the discussion page about the subject is just discussing the subject, not the article. See article WP:TALK for more. I note that you are continuing to talk to the subject at Talk:Helga Pataki [2] There is no indication there that this is about the article. Talk to how this could be included in the article and why it should be. Talk about changes your would like to make to the article. Don't just assert things you know or think. Also just because others are not using the talk pages correctly doesn't mean it is OK to continue the discussion - best to ignore it. --NrDg 00:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 7th street theatre )tv show

A tag has been placed on 7th street theatre )tv show requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mhking (talk) 16:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

The show needs to have not only notability, but verifiability; in otherwords it needs to have independent, verifiable sources that talk about it. Otherwise, it would be subject to being deleted. --mhking (talk) 22:14, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Response to your comment in the "erotomania" talk page

The situation that you described is not a disorder. Erotomania, however, is a rare type of psychosis. Roastporkbun (talk) 17:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)