April 2009

edit

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to William (Bill) Proser. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to William (Bill) Proser. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: William (Bill) Proser was changed by Sven the Wise (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-04-21T02:30:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of William (Bill) Proser

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article William (Bill) Proser, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.Beantwo (talk) 18:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply