Suvo19
Welcome!
Hello, Suvo19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joaquin008 (talk) 19:44, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Tables
editI would recommend not using rowspan at all. Just a basic row for each episode. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
But then the design required would not be created.
Content requires sources.
editPer policy You may NOT restore content that has been challenged without providing an inline citation to a reliable source that validates the claim. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Your claim of "Its 100% authentic" means nothing. You must substantiate each claim by providing a inline citation to a reliably published source. In addition, we are writing an encyclopedia - the list as you are restoring it has NOTHING of encyclopedic value, not even the episode name. We are not just collections of "100% authentic" junk. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- what you personally saw on television is precisely the type of unacceptable sourcing. You will need to find some reliably published source that validates the claim. And no. Just cause you put it in a list does not make it encyclopedic. There is nothing of value in that list, not even the episode name. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- What makes me think the episode list is of no value is the fact that there is NO ENCYCLOPEDIC CONTENT of any type in the list, not even the name of the episode. What makes YOU think that a list that has no information is encyclopedic? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- " It will help people to view them online specifying the story " We are expressly NOT a TV guide. We are an encyclopedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- What makes me think the episode list is of no value is the fact that there is NO ENCYCLOPEDIC CONTENT of any type in the list, not even the name of the episode. What makes YOU think that a list that has no information is encyclopedic? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- what you personally saw on television is precisely the type of unacceptable sourcing. You will need to find some reliably published source that validates the claim. And no. Just cause you put it in a list does not make it encyclopedic. There is nothing of value in that list, not even the episode name. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
"An encyclopedia or encyclopaedia (also spelled encyclopædia, see spelling differences)[1] is a type of reference work or compendium holding a comprehensive summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge". We summarize information.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.