User talk:Surbhi ghadia/sandbox

Hello all! This is my Talk Page. Please leave your suggestions here.

Peer Reviews

Peer Review 1

• The structure of your article flows very well and allows for the readers to build upon the knowledge that they gained in a previous paragraph.
• Perhaps you could build upon your Key Findings section and allow for further exploration into those studies, which you have initiated with the links to associated programs and organizations
• You have a great variation of sources used with in your article. They add greatly to the validity of your article.
• There were minimal grammatical errors that I could find, those that I found were edited and adjusted.
• You have succeeded in keeping a neutral non-biased tone when discussing your topic.
• You also are very good at explaining the information from your sources, which allows for your audience to clearly understand what you are discussing.

Ailobao (talk) 00:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review 2

Like I mentioned during lab, this article was very well crafted and feels incredibly well polished. One of the things I appreciated the most was the considerations you took for unit conversion. Little considerations like that are what make this article seem complete. Also, your use of hyperlinks was tasteful and well thought out for those that may need them.

I wonder if there are any pictures that you could include to have a point of reference for the location of the Hydrate Ridge? Such a picture may be helpful for those unfamiliar with the U.S. and more specifically Oregon State.

Other than that, this article seems ready for print so to say. Oceanfr (talk) 08:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)