Welcome!

edit

Hello Superstack, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you enjoy this place and decide to stay.

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes, like this: (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field, as this will help other users to know what you changed and why you changed it. Below are some (rather boring, but) useful links to help you learn your way around the encyclopedia as well as to help you become a successful editor.

I hope you will like editing here, and I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Good luck, and happy editing! J.delanoygabsadds 20:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Super, I'm not sure why the hate on Scarborough; not only does Bill Blair, Chief of Police have the stats backing up Scarborough as the safest part of the mega city, he lives there.

Delve into the stats, I'm sure they are hard to believe when you've grown up your whole life believing otherwise. Idyllic (talk) 19:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC) |}Reply

Stortini

edit

Please stop your edits there. Thank you. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 15:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it's because I'm an Oilers fan that I know the truth of what you're saying. I've watched him fight, and I know his style. I'm an avid reader of the Oilogosphere, where he's always referred to as "Huggy Bear". But that doesn't make it appropriate for inclusion here. If you can find a reliable source that refers to him as "Huggy Bear" or describes his style as hugging, then you can include the information (with a source). Until then, you can't.
Additionally, your edits about Starsky and Hutch were just plain old nonsense. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 16:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I explained why above: Wikipedia is a tertiary source, and including a subjective assessment of his fighting style is appropriate only if that style has previously been covered by reliable secondary sources. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply