Super Sintex

Hello Super Sintex, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Super Sintex, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 06:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay I'll get caught up on Wikipedia
Thank you.
Super Sintex

Please post at the right place

Please refrain from posting anything unrelated to the main page on Talk: Main Page. Your question is better posted at WP:VP. --76.64.180.9 (talk) 01:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Please look at the edit history carefully before accusing anyone of anything. An admin removed your post. Please also read the edit summaries and follow instructions there. Harass? Better you stop harassing me. --76.64.180.9 (talk) 03:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. "Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted..." Have you read Crisco's edit summaries in the history of Talk: Main Page yet? --76.64.180.9 (talk) 03:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Talk:Main page. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
First thing is I'm not an "edit war" I'm just doing my job, Second thing is IP Contributor:76.64.180.9 is harassing and keeps on undoing my edit even though I asked him repeatedly not to and he's trolling and harassing me, Third thing is I'm undoing his edit of him undoing my edit so I can keep it on the Main Page: Talk, Fourth thing is IP Contributor:76.64.180.9 should be blocked (for a period based on administrators judgement) for the following reasons:
Undoing multiple edit for no applicable reason, edit wars', possible conspiracy to get another user blocked, trolling, intimidating behavior/harassment, and Anonymous IP only.
Thank you.
Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. And seriously, don't claim to be an administrator. Blackguard 03:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Administrator userbox / WP:CIVIL

Hi Super Sintex, I noticed you seem to be in a bit of a dispute with 76.64.180.9. Please avoid making comments attacking other editors, even if you disagree with them. Remaining civil is one of the key pillars of Wikipedia. This helps to encourage users to collaborate.

I also noticed that this user also left you a message about claiming to be an administrator on your userpage. He is correct - you may have inadvertently copied the "this user is an administrator" userbox from another user when you made your userpage. You can remove this by taking out the line "{{User wikipedia/Administrator}}" from the bottom of your userpage.

Let me know if you have any questions, Prodego ^talk 03:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Super Sintex
That guy was being a dick and I'm not going to remove the admin userbox.
Super Sintex

If you think other users are behaving inappropriately you can bring it up at WP:ANI, but you still should avoid personally attacking them. Why do you want to have the admin userbox on your userpage if you are not an administrator? Prodego ^talk 04:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Unblock|Are you kidding one user tell you that I'm a sock puppet and you use that as "evidence" to block that isn't proof one use just one user, and they have no proof that I'm a "sock" which I' not and also assuming by your behavior you'll block anyone who's been requested I should of reported the IP dickhead to you instead (oh and when you reply don't use the I've known a user for a long time excuse

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Super Sintex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello why are you guys ignoring I'm not a "sock" there's no proof please I don't like this ban please unban me

Decline reason:

Clear sock case, and actions here indicate you're not here to contribute anyway. only (talk) 11:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.