Sunsetexpress

Hi,

I've just put the links back to the English Forum on the Zurich page. If you have a problem with the external link let me know and I'm happy to remove it.

Tim

Image copyright problem with Image:CarlPeterForster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CarlPeterForster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Zurich International Club

I'm sending it to an article for deletion so that it might be discussed by more editors. Cornell Rockey 15:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Zurich International Club which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 17:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Jordan Romero and editing

Hi, I saw your note on the talk page of Romero's article. I looked over your contribution history just to see if there might be some reason why you feel like you're always being reverted. While I didn't look at each of your actual changes, I do have one suggestion that might help. It looks like, for all of your edits, you're not leaving an "edit summary." In case you're not familiar with the feature, at the bottom of the editing window is a second, one line box that is labeled "Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made)". The purpose of this box is for editors to explain why they made the changes they did. So, if you look at the history, you'll see things like "added new information" or "corrected continent for Indonesia" or "reverted vandalism" or "removed dubious fact" or thousands of other different messages. The point is that these messages help others know why changes have been made. Sometimes, when there is no edit message, and the reason for the change isn't immediately obvious, others may suspect the edit was vandalism, or just that it wasn't made for a clear reason. Giving these reasons will really help people understand the purpose of each edit you make. Now, I'm not promising this will make your edits not get changed--the very definition of a collaborative editing process means that, over time, people contributions will be altered and possibly even removed. But in the case of the Romero article, if you leave an edit summary, no one should alter your edit, as it is factually correct. If you have any questions, please let me know. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Category:General Motors former executives has been nominated for merging

Category:General Motors former executives has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)