Suchithra.ravi

In response to your feedback

Thanks for visiting! If you have questions, visit Wikipedia:Tutorial or contact me at my talk page.

SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Thank you SwisterTwister! -- Suchithra.ravi (talk) 02:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you are interested in articles about neuroscience. You may perhaps also be interested in WP:WikiProject Neuroscience. Please feel free to get in touch with me any time if you have any questions at all about editing here. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Tryptofish! I am a graduate student in neuroscience and I am interested in this project. I hope to contribute more to it, as and when I get time.. ----Suchithra.ravi (talk) 02:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Tryptofish! I was seeing your user page and am inspired! Hope I can do my little bit to improve wiki. Please feel free to mention suggestions/criticisms about my editing.. -- Suchithra.ravi (talk) 02:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Neuroscience of sleep

Thank you for your wonderful article! It is a very valuable contribution to the encyclopedia. If you have time and inclination, an article which needs work (or total replacement), is Sleep architecture. I think such an article is important, but what is there is a mess of a stub. I'd like to see the corresponding section of Sleep reduced and info from there moved to Sleep architecture. Is this something you can do? Thanks, --Hordaland (talk) 02:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Hordaland! I did see the article on Sleep architecture while I was looking for material. I can try to work on this (may take a week or two before I get started).. I will let you know when that happens and maybe you can give me some suggestions.. -- Suchithra.ravi (talk) 02:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

There are differences of opinion. Some feel that there should be a 'complete' sleep architecture section in Sleep and no separate architecture article. Someone suggested merging Sleep architecture into Circadian rhythm, which makes no sense to me. A new possibility is a complete such section in Neuroscience of sleep. So it's just my opinion that we need a separate article. Your opinion should weigh heavily. --Hordaland (talk) 20:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I have been trying to read this up a little, because I am not much of an expert in sleep as such. I think the Sleep architecture article should be kept separate because there is more that can be written there. Adding it to Sleep might become too much detail on a sub-topic. Adding it to Neuroscience of Sleep is not a bad idea, but it is probably best to keep it as a separate article. Suchithra.ravi (talk) 03:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)