Hi. There are a couple of problems, but nothing we can't overcome. First, if he's writing and posting the article, that'a a conflict of interest explained at WP:COI. This isn't a problem as long as it's written in a neutral tone. If the content is based on existing copyrighted content, you would have to release the content on your own home page under the terms of this site's license. Problem is, it places your current copyright in danger of use and manipulation by others. So, to protect yourself, I'd suggest looking at WP:YFA to see what the tone of the article should look like. Consider the resulting article to be a sort of "free for all" in that anyone can use it under the GFDL license. That'll protect your main copyright. Please let me know if you have any other questions. If you'd like, I can restore the article and "neutralize" it myself. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Looks like you've restored it yourself. I'll see what I can do. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- You're just in time. :) I've already cleaned it up. It will still need to have the external links properly categorized within the article, but I think we have us a winner. He's certainly notable enough for inclusion. I hope I've been able to help you! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Glad to do it. If you can add any more of his accomplishments along with some corresponding links, please feel free to do so. Take care. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)