User talk:Stmrlbs/sandbox
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Stmrlbs in topic SPI 03 example
hat link edit
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
section a editblah blah blah section b editblah blah blah aaabbbcccddd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stmrlbs (talk • contribs) 02:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC) section c editblah blah blah |
section d edit
go.. section b --strmlbs|talk 02:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- bummer. this is why search results pointing to hatted discussions are hard to find.
SPI 01 example edit
this is how the font sizes are styled in wikipedia. why.. I don't know, but it seems to be the standard
Awaiting Clerk approval edit
Suspected Puppet edit
Report date August 17 2009, 01:18 (UTC) edit
Evidence submitted by Wikipedia Editor edit
SPI 02 example edit
does Report date have to be a superior section? why not equal with other sections? can there be more report dates per suspected puppet, or more subcategories on the same level. so far, I have not found any. alternative, with Report date being on even level with rest of SPI report.
Awaiting Clerk approval edit
Suspected Puppet edit
Report date August 17 2009, 01:18 (UTC) edit
Evidence submitted by Wikipedia Editor = edit
--stmrlbs|talk 20:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)