May 2023

edit
 

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} 331dot (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

This username reads out as a vulgar phrase that I don't wish to repeat(but will if needed). Happy to unblock once an acceptable new username is proposed. 331dot (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey, i didn't meant to offend lol. I'll just change it no problem FulckingCump (talk) 10:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, please propose a new name as instructed. 331dot (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
does Snailfish work FulckingCump (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Do also take not of the fact that it contains no profanity. It's obviously intended to mimic/mock profanity and if that is unacceptable or offensive then I apologise. I was not aware of the rules applying to such a name FulckingCump (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Just to explain, the username policy states "Note that usernames that are inappropriate in another language, or that represent an inappropriate name with misspellings and substitutions, or do so indirectly or by implication, are still considered inappropriate." 331dot (talk) 11:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Do too consider the fact that i have committed no breach of the rules in terms of editing. I have been diligently expanding one page in the proper and considerate way, using any salient information i can find FulckingCump (talk) 10:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
As the block notice describes, the only issue here is the username. Happy to unblock you once you propose a new username as instructed. You may also request a change of username yourself via Special:GlobalRenameRequest, and then request unblock. 331dot (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SternSoldat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

last name was considered inappropriate FulckingCump (talk) 10:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

Renamed, will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Adhesionman"(note the caps) is taken, so you will need to propose something else. You may just replace "AdhesionMan" with a new choice, you don't need to make a new request. 331dot (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

How do i replace it without making a new request then FulckingCump (talk) 11:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Just overwrite "AdhesionMan" with a new choice. You don't need to do anything to the rest of the request. 331dot (talk) 11:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've fixed it for you. Instead of using the reply function, just edit the entire page to overwrite a prior edit. In a moment I will attempt to process the change. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Apologies i am new to wikipedia use FulckingCump (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply