Welcome!

Hello, Steffen Boewe~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Lradrama 08:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Minilogue

edit

Greetings,

I noticed that you had created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minilogue to contest the proposed deletion of your Minilogue article. Without getting into the details of the article itself, there were a few problems with how you went about this.

  • The article had not been nominated for deletion under the formal Articles for deletion process. The deletion tag on the article is a "proposed deletion" tag, or "prod" for short, which is a less formal process for articles whose deletion is considered less controversial. The procedure for disputing the deletion of a prod-tagged article is simply to delete the tag and to provide your reason for doing so in either the edit summary for that edit or on the article's talk page.
  • That said, if the prod tag is deleted, but someone still thinks the article doesn't meet Wikipedia's guidelines, they can still nominate it deletion under the more formal process. If they do so, they would be the one to create the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minilogue page, and the AfD tag that would be applied to the article at that time would include a link to that page. As it stands now, nobody who reads the current article would even know that the AfD discussion page exists unless they also kept track of the AfD logs separately.
  • Also, new nominations would be placed on the log page for the current day. You added the AfD discussion page to the log from three days ago. The only reason I noticed any of this is because that day's log was still on my watchlist after nominating another article at that time.

All that having been said, I do agree with the one who tagged the article in the first place. As currently written, the article does not show that Minilogue meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical groups. Please read these guidelines, and then if possible please provide references to show how the group meets these guidelines.

I hope that this explanation hasn't confused you. If you have any other questions feel free to ask me. Thank you for your time. --Finngall talk 15:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Finngall, thank you for your information and help. So, may I made a mistake in that kind like I cited the history of Minilogue. I haven't much wiki-experience but it's clearly for me to respect the references and in the future I'll take care more intensive.
On the other side the reason of Proposed deletion in my oppinion is unjustified. I'm sure that Minilogue fullfills the WP:MUSIC. The rationale I wrote on the talk page. If you mean it's not enough, it was fine if you gave me some help, what I have to do to explain it. Best regards Steffen Boewe 20:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

03:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

19:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)