Staygyro

Welcome!

Hello, Staygyro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Strothra (talk) 00:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Hong Chenchou

A tag has been placed on Hong Chenchou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 23:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Battle of Songjin

A tag has been placed on Battle of Songjin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Battle of Songjin

A tag has been placed on Battle of Songjin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jmlk17 00:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

complaint

Could you be more specific? It makes it much easier to focus on the problem. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 04:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding reversions[1] made on January 19 2008 to Marshal of the Soviet Union

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

• Hi, I have looked into the history of the article and it looks like you are editwarring agaings pretty much everybody else. Please try to achieve a consensus on the talk page rather than edit war. IMHO, the question whether Joseph Stalin was a pure political MotSU or a Political/Army one does not deserve such a persistent edit warring Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wu Xiang (Ming General)

An editor has nominated Wu Xiang (Ming General), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Xiang (Ming General) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop the moves

Please stop moving articles from page to page, and please use valid edit summaries when you do move a page. Corvus cornix_talk 00:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Staygyro. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Corvus cornix_talk 00:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Do it by creating #REDIRECT pages, not by multiple moves. Corvus cornix_talk 03:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

In regards to your last post to ANI, if you ever want a page deleted that only you have ever edited, you can place on it the following text: {{db-author}} and an admin will soon come and delete it. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Browning BAR

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Browning BAR, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

please stop the move

I noticed that you moved James Soong to Soong Chuyu and then cut and paste the its content to Song Chuyu. This violates two Wikipedia's policies: 1) article should use common name, which in this case should be James Soong; 2) don't rename a page by cut and paste. I have requested to move Soong Chuyu back to James Soong. You may discuss at Talk:Soong Chuyu. Thank you for your understanding. --Neo-Jay (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

My Map

File:Tang Dynasty Map.jpg

Notability of Matt Morris (entrepreneur)

A tag has been placed on Matt Morris (entrepreneur) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DGG (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tang Dynasty Map.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Staygyro!
We thank you for uploading Image:Tang Dynasty Map.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gewehr88.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gewehr88.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 14:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Kunio iwashita

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kunio iwashita, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://aviationartstore.com/iwashita_2.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Statism in Showa Japan

Hi,

during your move to change the discussion page of Statism in Showa Japan to Japanese Fascism, you erased all the earlier comments and evaluation... Merging the two discussions pages would have been a better solution as all the related info is lost. --Flying Tiger (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Tupolev Tu-160

Any reason why you moved this to Blackjack Bomber then moved it back straight away? or was it just a mistake, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 11:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

J-XX

Please correct typo "intergration" to "integration" since I cannot edit. Thanks. Ootsuka02 (talk) 02:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to People's Republic of China, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 23:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Avia Av-14

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bryce Wilson | talk 22:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Soldiers Sortie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

WP:Sources

Hi Staygyro, greetings. I've noticed your additions to Sudanese Armed Forces in these recent weeks. I really appreciate your help expanding this article and bringing it up to date. However, I have just had to remove one of your recent edits - this one. WP:BURDEN says that the person who added the information needs to provide evidence (WP:Reliable sources) that the information is accurate. I've just rechecked the IISS Military Balance 2011, and it shows no Type 96 main battle tanks in service with the SAF. Please readd the entry once you have a source. Kind regards, Buckshot06 (talk) 20:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Ma Yuan

I read the article on Ma Yuan. Towards the end it is mentioned that some people schemed to tarnish his name, and Emperor Guangwu was led into believing the accusations against Ma Yuan, and subsequently stripped Ma of his fief and title of marquess. I was curious if Emperor Guangwu (or his successors)ever came to know the truth regarding Ma Yuan. Was Ma Yuan given the respect and honor he deserved later on? It'd be great to know about this chapter of this great military maestro's life. Thanks for putting up an article on him.

Kindest regards

(MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC))

Bismarck class

You have been around for far too long to not know better. Stop edit-warring and take your complaint to the talk page. Parsecboy (talk) 12:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Sovetsky Soyuz-class battleship

What the hell was the point of these multiple moves? By doing so you've broken the history of the articles and have failed to reassociate the talk page with the proper article page.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

intermediate cartridge

do you realize that you are trying to change a fact that everyone accept except you? facts don't change just because you want them to change. - Avatar⁸⁹⁶ 16:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, facts are dependent upon figures and statistics, so give me a proper source or statement that supports the statistics you added. Then we will be able to trust the reliable statistics that wikipedia gives.

Adding personal opinions to an ENCYCLOPEDIC article is not valid either. Your edit violated WP:NOR.

By the way, I actually gave my reason, when i opened the "debate", saying that they had enough energy to be categorized as intermediate cartridge. - Avatar⁸⁹⁶ 19:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Which is simply isn't true. Look at the page on Taylor KO Factor. Have you done TKO calculations for these munitions? and compared them to GENUINE intermediate munitions?Staygyro (talk) 23:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

By who or what? Then by what authority do you designate cartridges? "Popular arguement is NOT a valid debate tactic". What makes you think that TKO factor is the determining factor for cartridge classification? What makes you think that you have the permission to say what is wrong or right? Does anyone else or source even support your statement? Do you think you can just put anything you want on wikipedia?

I already read your answer on your talk page btw. - Avatar⁹ⁿ 14:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

• For one, There are several ways of measuring stopping power, such as momentum and KE, but these do not consider the importance of bore diameter, which is very important in stopping power, so that makes the TKO the best formula there is for measuring stopping power. Other formulae, Thorniley Factor and the Hatcher Factor, all of which factors in the bore, the velocity and the mass of the bullet, all lead to similar results with regards to the topic discussed, i.e. the fact that the 5.56x45mm, 5.45x39mm and the 5.8x42mm have similar values to each other, but markedly different to REAL immediate rounds like the 7.62x39mm, the 6.8mm SPC, the 7.92 Kurz, the .280 British and the Japanese 6.5mm Arisaka.
• For two, where is the source or figures to support the "popular assertion"? Staygyro (talk) 15:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honglaowai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taishang Huang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cixi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English-based creole languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Staygyro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hi! User:Hijiri88 here (for some reason I am unable to login no matter how I try), I noticed your recent edits to a page on my watchlist. In the future, you should refrain from making page moves suddenly and by yourself unless you give a rationale on the talk page or in your edit summary. If, as appears to have happened here, you make a mistake and immediately self-revert, you should also note that somewhere, preferably in your edit summary.

I spent about two minutes trying to figure out what it was you had done because it really was not clear from your edits. (Although part of that was because the email notification system doesn't work correctly with parenthetical disambiguators, at least on my email provider, and I was misdirected to a page you didn't edit.)

180.221.235.82 (talk) 12:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Staygyro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Staygyro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)