User talk:StarScream1007/Archive7

Repeat

I disagree. It's a work in progress, and so far, that is what it is. I see your point, I just disagree with it. If we don't win it all, I suggest we combine 2007 and 2008 sections. Hopefully, though, we will have to write a sub article on the Great 08 Cubbies.

That said, what a great day.... 10 more games.... NO PRESSURE!!!! I love it!!!!

I feel like a very close friend just died. Then again, the BoSox felt this way in '04.... like I've been fooled again. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 16:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

CUBS SUCK BURN TAKE IT CHICAGO SUCKS GO EVERY OTHER METROPOLITAN AREA IN THE WORLD. 214.13.192.187 (talk) 12:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Off topic

Hello, There seems to be some areas missing in Chester benningtons history the early years (actually quite a bit)!... there are some missing additions as well as bands he has played for that have not been added. To make the last statment true prior to linkin park (XERO, HYBRID THEORY) The last band that he played for prior to Leaving Phoenix to go audition for Xero was NRG with Coney Huhn, A two piece. Please make note of it so the information is correct. Thanks 98.165.129.90

Since you commented that the Chester Bennington article is off topic can you help me fix it? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Good/Thanks. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Pacman_Jones#Requested_move_to_Adam_Jones_.28football.29_revisited

I would like to solicit feedback concerning moving this to Adam Jones (football). It makes sense to me, but is there consensus? Please opine in the section of the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Star, I was trying to make a "weasel" line less so, but you cut to the chase on it. The Bears article really needs some editing. There's a lot of filler phrases like someone's trying to meet a minimum word requirement for a school assignment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookiehead (talk • contribs) 18:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Prime3characters.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Prime3characters.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chris-new.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chris-new.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Template Substitution

Hi there. When you add a user warning template to a user’s page please remember to substitute it. If wish to reply to this message please use my talk page and if you need help feel free to talk to me there or you may find Wikipedia:SUB helpful. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!!

		The Original Barnstar
		Great job with your work on Brian Urlacher, especially those tricky refs. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Bone to pick

What makes you the rulemaker on all things bears related? Bad and Good go into articles. Get a life and stay off wikipedia for a good month or two. People like you are the reason that wikipedia is a joke. Too much of your personal feelings goes into making sure nothing you don't agree with gets put into an article. Last I checked your job wasn't encyclopedia writer, so let others ideas be put into articles.214.13.192.187 (talk) 19:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Why? Because my contributions have been made of win and awesome since '05. If you have a problem with that, I suggest filing a proper complaint with WP:AIN, as opposed to littering my talk page with pusillanimous comments. If your jealous with the fact no one cares about your contributions, then I suggest that you find a life or perhaps a better hobby. Until then, have a nice day. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  22:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

No, Douchey McDouchenstien, I'm angry that anyone who edits a page that you personally don't approve of, you revert and claim vandalism. You are the enemy of Wikipedia. I added in that he has also been called Interceptersaurus Rex and you call it vandalism? Why? Because I'm not sucking off your beloved QB? 214.13.192.187 (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Funny, I always though you made all the rules on everything. Where has this guy been? So anyway, how's life after the Cubtastrophy? We OVERPAID for CumDumpster.... Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 06:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

yeah good point. Screw the cubs. 214.13.192.187 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for the barnstar. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Resi5-logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Resi5-logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot

(talk) 05:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

To check the work on web pages before deleting

Hello, There seems to be some areas missing in Chester benningtons history the early years (actually quite a bit)!... there are some missing additions as well as bands he has played for that have not been added. To make the last statment true prior to linkin park (XERO, HYBRID THEORY) The last band that he played for prior to Leaving Phoenix to go audition for Xero was NRG with Coney Huhn, A two piece. Please make note of it so the information is correct. Thanks 98.165.129.90 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.129.90 (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

hey. this is a shout out. seriously, if someone wrote on a page and the text sounds legible and wouldnt upset anyone but is not cited, shouldn't the user to delete the text veryfy if the text is actually correct? shouldn't they go on the internet and check if the user was correct but didn't cite? if they were wrong the user must delete it, but if they were right, they user who would otherwise delete the text, should cite it or atleast try to help the other user for their work was put in and they probably wasted all that time. please answer this!!

([First http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.231.131.94&oldid=260275669 reply])

that is fine...but the fact is that if you take the responsibility to post correct information on a website as big as wikipedia, shouldnt you be generous enough to respect what someone else has done and check it before deleting it. if you find it fake then deleting it is the best thing you could do...but deleting it even if it is true....dude...thats a bit cruel.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.131.94 (talk) 07:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Exactly!!!! StarScream1007 keeps deleting anything he cannot Google. I'm sorry guy but everything doesn't always appear on Google nor the web. Again you should at least please try AZ Secretary of State trade names from the years 1998 - 1999 is when the name should have been purchased and published for NRG music. The Trade names if they are not re-newed I am not sure if they stay on file or not with the AZSOS. I could make a website and post all kinds of information that is not true just like anyone else but that doesn't make the information TRUE AND CORRECT even though it is now VERIFIABLE! Anyways, my point being the information is absolutely true and correct so please let it post! StarScream1007 I would appreciate you not deleting the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.129.90 (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Major Award

		The Cubs Barnstar
		Thanks for all your help with the Cubs pages.... Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 23:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

This is a lot better than a leg lamp!!!! Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 00:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Marquis only gave up the #21 a day or 2 earlier when he was dealt to Colorado. (A move that makes no sense unless they do end up with Peavy or another #1 starter, by the way.) I am not a big Sammy fan anymore, but seeing that he played in Chicago most of his career and was very good for a long time, he deserves his #21 to be flying on the foul poles, as does Gabby Hartnett, for that matter (Led us to 4 pennants in the 1930's).... Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 20:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Exactly!!!! StarScream1007 keeps deleting anything he cannot Google. I'm sorry guy but everything doesn't always appear on Google nor the web. Again you should at least please try AZ Secretary of State trade names from the years 1998 - 1999 is when the name should have been purchased and published for NRG music. The Trade names if they are not re-newed I am not sure if they stay on file or not with the AZSOS. I could make a website and post all kinds of information that is not true just like anyone else but that doesn't make the information TRUE AND CORRECT even though it is now VERIFIABLE! Anyways, my point being the information is absolutely true and correct so please let it post! StarScream1007 I would appreciate you not deleting the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.129.90 (talk) 19:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fusion prime.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Fusion prime.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Please note

It appears you've attributed to revisions made to the Madden NFL page by an anonymous IP to me...which they weren't. I would appreciate if that in the future you want to attribute stuff to me, make sure it was me first. If you'll notice, I was having a discussion regarding the section in the talk page. Why would I remove the tag if I was still discussing it?...Moral of the story:don't blame me for crap I didn't do!!Infero Veritas (talk) 13:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

So I took another look at what you did. My apologies. I read it wrong and thought you were attributing the edits made by the IP 66.229.246.168 to me. It appears that what you were referring to was the line I added about Favre's retirement. Would that be correct? and if so...what is the problem with that? Infero Veritas (talk) 14:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Anon IP getting a bit shirty on some RE pages.

97.106.45.159 - incivility in edit summaries, giving level 3 (or whatever it is) vandalism warnings to IPs for their first offence etc. I think the user may also be 97.106.44.244. Similar abusive edit summaries. Your watchful eye would be appreciated. Geoff B (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Much appreciated! Geoff B (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

He's also 97.106.48.181. Same activity. Geoff B (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm ALL of them. It's called IP RANGE. I don't know why my IP changes. I'm no computer wiz. Anyway, I'm not Shirty. I'm a jerk with a nasty attitude. That's really it.

He's doing the warning thing again, because an anon IP had the temerity to revert him. He's also registered another account as SyphonFilter1987. Geoff B (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I've spoken to this user, and made an offer on their talk page. If they can adhere to the following, I'm agreeing to postpone filing the checkuser report:

• Edit from one account, stop editing as an IP
• Drastically tone down language, be more civil
• Stop edit warring

I've given them until tomorrow to respond, after which point I will carry through with filing the report. Lychosis ^T/C 16:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Opened an SPI. Geoff B (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. On a semi-related note, IP 72.192.1.45 may be Daymeee logging out of his account to edit war (see RE2, RE5, and RE's histories, where Daymeee makes some reversions, then the IP, then Daymeee again, within minutes across the articles. Geoff B (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

86.143.125.177/86.165.81.180/86.170.16.43 are all the same user, revert-heavy (revert-exclusive I think) edit histories, no communication, misleading edit summaries when they bother to leave one ('rv v'). Doesn't respond to warnings, just seems to shift IPs when blocked. Probably worth reporting to someone, not sure who. Geoff B (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what it is about RE articles but it really seems to attract certain kinds of editors. Like me, I suppose! :-) Hopefully the silly editing season is over. Geoff B (talk) 12:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

That IP picked up a 24hr block when I pointed out some more of his edits. Previous blocks didn't dissuade him, lets hope this one does. Geoff B (talk) 03:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I've added 86.132.133.20 to your report, hoping for a quick response. Geoff B (talk) 23:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I see he's back again. My turn to put in a report?  :-) Geoff B (talk) 16:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Report's in. Hope everything's okay squire, should be able to hold the fort until you return, barring a sudden storm of vandalising IPs.  ;-) Geoff B (talk) 17:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Nice one, glad to have you back. Think we were alright actually, bit of an anticlimax. There I was, the RE pages open in tabs, and nothing happens. Typical. :-) RE5 is protected until July though, so that did contribute... Geoff B (talk) 06:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Resident Evil 5

I believe that Ozwell Spencer's fate is an important fact to be mentioned in the Resident Evil 5 article. He has been made a pivotal character in every RE game since the first, and there are sources that there are many fans who are saddened by his abrupt, unexpected demise. [1] EgraS (talk) 00:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

OK this isn't Resident Evil 5-related but I've noticed at least some people are appreciating my work and have put my the release date style I created into their own version :) instead of others complaining its too discriptive....there could never be such things as too much information so um this is rare for me to say cause some admins here act like A-holes and complain about my way of doing things when each of us have our own so thank you nad I'm glad i'm inspiring people to put some of my way of writing an article in this case a resident evil article into their own...even myself I look at some of the latest article versions n compare it to mine to c what im missing or what need to b updated so glad to help...instead of sum of you admins complaining you should know that Wikipedia is a user created website where every1s voice should be heard...now ofcourse we are all not gonna agree on the way we edit but thats also the beauty of it we all have our own unique style of editing. I take some info from updated article versions n put it into my own in case im outdated in some information in my version of the article and the same goes the other way around so instead of some of the admins complaing about how some people do things they should appreciate that there's millions of us here editing for a good cause(at least most of us LOL) so thanx again guy or girl who put so of my ideas into your own....lets hope we inspire each other and no argue n not get harrassing emails form admins telling you they dont like your way of doing things cause we r all unique in doing articles....some look almost the same others completely different but even in the slightest way we r somehow working together for the same cause (n most of us dont even get paid for it lol).Like hopefully most of u I want to come here and look for an article that contains the most updated info n most informative facts so i wont have to go to a bunch of sites to look for a certain fact...its better to c all dat in just 1 article than lookin for many articles on different websites to get info lil by lil which I did for example in the releasde dates in the resident evil franchise which is mainly my focus until i finish them all....like some of you I put hours of editing and research in some websites in my case I found a very informative website that gives me the release dates n other info of most the release on the resident evil franchise called "Lost Releases".com ,gamefaqs.com and other articles in wikipedia mostly to get my facts in releases so all u other editors can go there too and tell some of them simple minded admins that my information is as accurate as possible....thnx again and I'm glad ppl are taking some of my ideas and put it on their own....69.125.30.234 (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Fine

But only because you said please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.106.45.136 (talk) 21:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Good job!

Awesome job on the Rex Grossman article. I've never seen a stat chart in a football-related article, it looks awesome.

Do you think you could look over the Javon Ringer article and make some reccomendations as to what i can do to improve it? Ringerfan23 (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

W flag

come on, brother. edit, don't undo. the tradition may have been started by a season ticket holder, but it was clearly adopted by the club, since there is now licesned apparel sold with the w on it.... in order to be licensed by the club and by the nhl, you can assume it was adopted by the hawks. ive been gone awhile, but im back now. how r u? go bulls tonight. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 23:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kim-mug.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Kim-mug.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:TomWad.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:TomWad.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 17:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

NHL 10 GAMEINFORMER section was not finished yet

You reverted all my edits to NHL 10 before it was even finished. It was going to have all the insider information about the bug fixes and stuff. ugh, why did you do that? that was very annoying Neo The User (talk) 00:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

One more thing, that means that what I posted was illegal right? Will I get sued??? I'm so terribly sorry and I won't ever ever ever do it again. Neo The User (talk) 00:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The reason I continue to remove your "additions" to the NHL 10 page is because you are simply adding a paragraph with no basis. You say that the be-a-pro feature will be changed, but you do not specify as to how, or where you are receiving this information. All you are doing is cluttering the page with a bulky paragraph that tells the reader nothing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.4.80.171 (talk) 20:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

links

hellow! Why you delete my site? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Highlanderbf (talk • contribs) 13:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Baseball Steroid List

I put the ref on the category page, but this is not unsourced and your reverts are out of line. Dkendr (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Can you lock my Be-A-Pro paragraph in NHL 10?

Can you lock my Be-A-Pro paragraph in NHL 10? It keeps getting vandalized. Neo The User (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Resident Evil 5

Hi there. Yeah, I guess real life sort of got in the way of editing these last few months. It wasn't really a planned break or anything, but stuff kept coming up that prevented me from editing. The edit warring got pretty bad at the RE5 article when I left it. I'll get back to editing eventually, but I'll avoid the edit wars for now. See you around! --Atlan (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Dusty Baker

I have added an article from the Chicago Tribune that specifically states he "was getting playing time, even while he was struggling". If you don't think that substantiates my comments then I can reword them to better reflect the verbiage in the Tribune article. 208.65.192.1 (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dethklok&oldid=306441507

Hello StarScream1007/ShadowJester07,

I was curious as to why you undid my edits. What are the "uncanny misfortunes" they have encountered? In watching the series, they have been phenomenally fortunate, achieving wealth and fame that even the most successful mainstream rock bands in this world have not approached, let alone death metal bands with a much narrower audience. They have survived all assassination attempts, usually by without even being aware of it, and there's no sign that there success will abate in the future. If I misunderstood what you wrote, please clarify what you meant. Since I think what I wrote was accurate in context, "often massively destructive actions and supernatural good fortune", there should be a way to include both your text and mine in the article. Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Awksedperl (talk) 18:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:HawksvBJ.jpg

File:HawksvBJ.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:HawksvBJ.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:HawksvBJ.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:58, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Maddenlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Maddenlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Tom Waddle "vandalism"

I added material to the Tom Waddle page. It was removed and I was accused of vandalism.

If you were the person who cited my addition as vandalism, you are either an idiot or you don't know the Tom Waddle subject. Tom Waddle gained fame as a Chicago Bears wide receiver and his most memorable event was the day he was administered smelling salts three times, thus tying the unofficial smelling salts record.

If you don't like the way I wrote up the event, then edit it. Or even remove it and tell me that the tone or tenor was off. Don't act like I was vandalizing Wikipedia. I only added the material because I saw an article that was so badly lacking and I wanted to contribute.

-Ben Miller —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.191.124.194 (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Madden Curse

I'm sorry, you just erased an hour of my work on Madden NFL. The talk section doesn't really explain the grounds for you doing that. I'd appreciate an explanation as all of my edits were cited and correct. The whole section of "Madden Curse" is based on circumstance, certainly there is no such thing as a curse but there's no reason to eliminate the coincidence of the situation. Furthermore, the Madden NFL talk page shows large interest in keeping or expanding the "Curse" section as well as disappointment in the removal o the original curse article. From what I gather, you are the only one in that discussion who's against it. The majority of the editors want the information in there. You have no right to delete someone's work because of your own personal opinion. —ASPENSTI—TALK—CONTRIBUTIONS 16:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

• The discussion on the talk page of the original Madden Curse [2] article it was decided to Merge the information with the Madden NFL article, not to remove it or reduce it. There is no reason to allow 2 references but not 6 or more. The "Madden Curse" is brought up every season because every season the player on the cover of the game gets injured. Its interesting and notable and based on most of the talk discussions, most editors find the information worthy. I'm not sure why you're going so far over this, all this information enriches the article and it harms no one. It also doesn't detract anything from that core of the article. —ASPENSTI—TALK—CONTRIBUTIONS 21:17, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

File:JJam.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:JJam.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —teb728 t c 06:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Gears of War 2

I'm going to presume this was a mistake as I've seen you make good edits consistently, but you messed up here when you reverted gibberish. You also reverted a good edit and made it look like you made a bad one. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 10:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of creatures in the Resident Evil series

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of creatures in the Resident Evil series. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of creatures in the Resident Evil series (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)