Welcome!

Hello, Ss19751975, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name.


Your recent edits

edit

In case you didn't know, spaces usually come after punctuation marks.

Instead of this:
  • I like bunnies.They are not only cute,but friendly too.
Try this:
  • I like bunnies. They are not only cute, but friendly too.

Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Ezhavas, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please can you not add names to the List of Ezhavas unless you can link to an article or to a cited source, either of which must substantiate that the person is indeed an Ezhava. Sitush (talk) 14:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Second time - you have just added two more names, one of which had neither a citation nor an article here on Wikipedia, and the other of which did have an article but still nothing to show that the man is an Ezhava. Where are you getting your information from? I could perhaps show you how this is done. - Sitush (talk) 14:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Ezhavas. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 15:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of Ezhavas

edit

You have again added a long list of uncited and unlinked names to List of Ezhavas. This is your final warning: all information included in Wikipedia must be verifiable using reliable sources. This list even has a note at the top of it warning people not to add information that cannot comply. I did not add that warning but I do agree with it.

If you do this once more then I shall seek a block of your editing, sorry. It is not as if you are even communicating about these issues. - Sitush (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to List of Ezhavas, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Well, less vandalism than disruption on a large scale. You claim that you do not know why your edits are being reverted but it is explained above, time and again, and also in the edit summaries. They either need a citation to prove that they are Ezhava or an article on Wikipedia that proves it. In all cases, you fail to do this. Sitush (talk) 19:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please take up varna issue at Talk:Ezhava

edit

Greetings, I reverted your deletion at Ezhava as you didn't give a clear reason for removing explicitly cited text. If you have concerns about the cites and/or content, please bring it up at Talk:Ezhava. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of Ezhavas

edit

I believe that it is possible you are editing List of Ezhavas while logged out. If you are then please stop now. Doing so is disruptive and will not avoid sanctions being imposed on you - these matters can be verified by trusted administrators etc. If you are not so doing, then I apologise. - Sitush (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply