Spubert
and you are... who precisely?--— Preceding unsigned comment added by IanLowe (talk • contribs) 21:40, 30 July 2007
Spubert, please review the official WP policy contained in {{Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] at your earliest convenience. Granted, this article is not a biography, but it has biographical features and I feel you might be crossing the line into libel in a few places. Please reign yourself in accordingly.--Filll 21:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific? The guy in question admits the quote is his, so quoting it can't be libellous. Spubert 22:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on British Centre for Science Education. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing.
Verifiable Sources
editHi there! I understand that it appears that Ian Lowe has confirmed the quote, but even his confirmation in self-published media is not sufficiently verifiable. From my point of view, that quote isn't particularly integral to the article and the controversy could be demonstrated without stepping into such conflict. From a "do no harm" perspective, I don't think it should be included. However, I can see that you feel very strongly about it, so my advice to you right now is to open a Request for comment on the matter. Nothing bad will happen if you wait for greater community consensus, and it will reflect very well on your ability to resolve conflict. Are you willing to do that? Thanks for replying to me, and don't hesitate to drop by my talk page if you have any more questions.--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 22:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)