April 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to SpaceX CRS-8 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Falcon 9. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Falcon 9 was changed by SpaceX CRS-8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950075 on 2016-04-08T23:13:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at SpaceX, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: SpaceX was changed by SpaceX CRS-8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952331 on 2016-04-08T23:14:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mkdwtalk 23:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply