Sp4rt4n
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cerberus Capital Management. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
Please do not add that link back to Cerberus Capital Management or I will have you blocked from contributing. IP4240207xx (talk) 07:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
edit
November 2009
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Illuminati do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Sp4rt4n (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The site nexus23.org is not a blog neither i posted the link to such advertsise or spam links for earning such money, i'm waiting an answer , thank you
Decline reason:
You're not blocked. However, if you continue to post spurious attacks on other's talk pages, you will be blocked. TNXMan 14:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Rsrikanth05. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TNXMan 14:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Sp4rt4n (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes.But now I can post the link about the Illuminati article on the Illuminati wikipedia page ?
Please include a decline or accept reason.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Not unless you get consensus to add it by first discussing it on the article's talk page. TNXMan 15:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- And given that it does not pass WP:EL, I don't see that as likely. I suggest you give up on this, and go edit other articles. Blueboar (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Nexus23.org
editI see from your edit history that all of your edits so far have centered on adding material that is hosted by the website nexus23.org as an external link to articles. Are you connected to that website in some way? Blueboar (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't see what that site does so bad , I won't use anymore wikipedia to spread info ,
i won't use wikipedia at all , this is not a free site , who does not think as you do is considered an enemy , your editors invent stuff to kick me out , now leaving the personal stuff out , nexus23.org is a normal site that reports article and such interesting material , asking nothing , advertising nothing and pretending no donations , if you want to demonstrate opposite you are welcome , go .
Seeing you so hostile for just nothing I just think that you people of Wikipedia are like the owners of the absolute truth and culture and really anyone should give up on this .
Thank you , at least for years i thought the opposite .
--Sp4rt4n (talk) 06:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Um... I was not intending to be hostile... all I asked was if you are connected to the site in some way? Blueboar (talk) 14:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
No , why? Oh well if you intend I've been paid to put down links to nexus23 that is absolutely absurd. Neither I know the people that make it , I only find their shit interesting . That's all . --Sp4rt4n (talk) 17:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- OK... thanks. Just so you know, we have had a problem with people connected with various websites (not necessarily paid to do so) misusing Wikipedia to boost the sites on-line profile (a form of "Spamming")... and your edit history did fit the profile. However, we are supposed to try to assume good faith here, and so I thought I should ask you directly instead of jumping to conclusions and accusing you of wrongdoing. I am glad that your intent was not to spam, but simply to share a site you liked.
- So that your future editing is less stressfull... may I suggest that you take the time to read up on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (and yeah... we do have a lot of them) ... Since you seem to be interested in adding External Links, you should probably start with WP:EL. I would also suggest reading our core content policies: WP:Verifiability (and its associated guideline WP:Reliable sources), WP:No original research, and WP:Neutral point of view.
- Please understand that people are not making rules up just to harrass you... our policies and guidelines reflect the consensus of the entire Wikipedia community. Don't take them personally. Blueboar (talk) 18:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad finally that you understood my good faith and my good will .
Thinking on why all of this started i must admit i overreacted about this illuminati link but also someone that did not delete a blog entry and accused mine edit to be a blog link without to be true caused my little struggle for the truth and the justice .
Thank you again , Wikipedia is still a free and valid portal/website of knowledge .
--Sp4rt4n (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- No problem... remember... just because someone reverts you, or removes a link you added, they are not attacking you personally. Assuming good faith works both ways. Best wishes and happy editing Blueboar (talk) 23:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)