Welcome!

Hello, Son of Kong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Beowulph 20:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

reply to your message from my talk page edit

I believe the Dragonball (film) article shouldn't be deleted. Leave it up for a while. —This unsigned comment was added by Son of Kong (talkcontribs) 12:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC).Reply

Sorry, I haven't a clue what you're referring to. Can you please give me an exact link? Thanks. Stifle 20:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Go to Vegeta, then go down to the movies he was in & it'll say that Christian Bale will be portraying him in a live action movie. Click on it & it has a little information but says it may be deleted soon.

Andre the Giant edit

I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.(Halbared 17:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC))Reply

Please don't remove the SI units from Andre's page.(Halbared 08:28, 14 July 2006 (UTC))Reply

Glen Jacobs edit

I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.(Halbared 17:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC))Reply

Kevin Nash edit

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. McPhail 14:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Robin Christensen edit

Robin Christensen has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 13:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Batista and Rebecca edit

Please do not add there dating on either page. News site are not 100% correct. Until it is confirmed by either batista or rebecca it will be removed each time is it add as it is rumours. So please do not add it anymore. Lil crazy thing 08:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Talk pages edit

 
Please do not delete other people's comments on talk pages, as you did at Talk:Timmy Turner. It is considered vandalism, and you may be Blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue in this manner. Even if you don't like their opinion, please be civil and remember that they are entitled to it.

-Shannernanner 09:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

User page edit

Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Shannernanner 05:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Excessive Swearing on Talk Pages edit

Please understand that swearing of any kind on Wikipedia is against the rules and you may just get banned from the community itself if you continue to act this way, as you have done on the talk page of Dalip Singh I hope you understand :) -Correctus 13:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Regarding edits made to Talk:Ben 10 edit

 
Warning

Please do not delete other people's comments on talk pages. It is considered vandalism, and you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue in this manner. Even if you don't like their opinion, please be civil and remember that they are entitled to it. --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 13:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Even though useless, policy is policy, and removal of content is considered vandalism (that is, if it isn't a personal attack, in which case, it should be removed), so it's better to just not remove it, Ok? Oh, on a side note, the toolbar that appears when you edit a page, also contains a button that looks like a signature ( ), which when clicked will produce this: --~~~~. The software will then convert this automatically into your signature and date of posting; in short use it after making comments, or just type four tildes(~~~~). --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 14:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Making the Game: Triple H's Approach to a Better Body, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 16:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Zangya edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Zangya, by Kbdank71, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Zangya fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

this page is a redirect to a deleted page


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Zangya, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Zangya itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Clover edit

Before Taking the Picture Off the article Please go into Discussion and Discuss why it should be taken off than just remove it. Since it been up it has clarified that the monster was Confirmed dead by Abrams Himself. IF you have a reason why it should not be on there go to Discussion or it will be considered as Vandalism if it continues. Thanks You --҉ რɫՒ◌§ 9¤ 05:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Velkan Valerious edit

 

I have nominated Velkan Valerious, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velkan Valerious. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Betsy Rue edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Betsy Rue. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of J Lethal edit

 

A tag has been placed on J Lethal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dee Dee Davis edit

 

The article Dee Dee Davis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable fails WP:ENT (needs two notable roles) and WP:GNG (lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 12:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Aldar (Smallville)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aldar (Smallville). Since you had some involvement with the Aldar (Smallville) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Baern (Smallville)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baern (Smallville). Since you had some involvement with the Baern (Smallville) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply