Somalia1995

Your edits

Hello. Kindly stop adding original research to articles. Wikipedia functions according to reliable sources only, and the material you keep adding to the Somalia and History of Somalia articles in place of material which is already sourced (see the books in the References section of the respective articles) is not verifiable because it is only coming from you. Please in future respect Wikipedia's sourcing policies and try and gain consensus for your edits rather than just reverting. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 22:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

hello, Middayexpress, in regard to the messages you have sent me, I have my edits based on archeological evidence through the excavations i've formerly and currently done in native Somalia and am writing essays i wish to publish based on the evidence i have found in my Homeland. im just editing upon my research and archeological evidence through my excavations and also have many references to somewhat back my evidence prior to my excavations and after it, furthermore i have been working on excavation digs in Somaliland since the late 90s and through it have found many evidence leading to backing my edits

so in conclusion i kindly implore you to stop editing my work, and to stop reverting them in reason because they are facts i have discovered in Somalia and as a Somali who has fled a civil war and losing my father in the war and having lived as a refugee in ethiopia i have more knowledge of the somali people in how their minds work and how they work through clan lineages and know much about their culture and history considering i lived there all my life and in fact lived near an archeological site before the war occured

however i do apologize for my references and how i placed them in the references section of the article

Thank You Somalia1995

That's all very well and good Somalia1995, but that doesn't change the fact that you've repeatedly added unsourced material that's not from reliable sources and despite having been asked not to do so. In fact, you've just admitted above that your material was original research. It also doesn't change the fact that you've violated 3RR across two articles simultaneously. Middayexpress (talk) 00:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Middayexpress (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)