February 2008

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nigger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nigger was changed by Soldior60 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-17T23:35:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

What do you need?

edit

Dear Soldior60, what is it you are needing? When I look at your edits, all of them seem to be rather weird for an ancyclopedia. Are you serious about them? You can experiment in the Sandbox. Vandalism can lead you to be banned permanently from the project. Making jokes is no point: they are removed pretty quick and only one or two people will notice them before they are removed. It's just annoying, that's all. What do you need? — Sockrates dual 23:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Editing concerns

edit
  1.   Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kukini hablame aqui 15:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Thing Thing Series

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Thing Thing Series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TNX-Man 14:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2010

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. decltype (talk) 19:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soldior60 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That wasn't vandalism you idiots. I found the picture and posted it. How the hell is it vandalism?

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. Kuru (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.