When looking at the Revision History of this user's sandbox, I noticed that they had added an Economics section, finished a table on the page, and added to Habituation, as well as adding to Terror Management Theory and helping to contribute to yet another table on the page. To the best of my knowledge on Dual Process Theory, the information contributed to the page by this user is valid and accurate. The layout and organization of this user's edits and contributions are orderly and easy to understand. Also, grammar appears to be correct. However, the wording and clarity of the contributions are slightly difficult to understand. This is especially the case for those who may read the information but are unfamiliar with the article or with some of the terms and jargon used in psychology. Another suggestion that I have for this user is to add the date of the studies that are being cited or referenced in the sections, such as at the beginning of the Economics section. Overall, the edits made by this user are constructive and add to the information already included on the page. AdamNess7 (talk) 23:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply