Smzcl

In regard your edit (on the Tea Party movement); even if some polls were to show the TP to be less well-educated (I haven't checked your additional reference), it would be inappropriate to completely remove polls which show the contrary, such as the first one listed. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Regarding my edit (on the Tea Party movement) I was correcting that the source (already listed in the page as name="vogel1" ) reads "...the poll also found that tea partiers are less educated, but more interested in politics." and the wiki page reads "...likely to be more wealthy and have more education" and sources that article. I did not add a source, I simply moved the source already present, as there is a clear error here, or rather a selective exclusion or bias towards certain parts of the source. Smzcl (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

The first reference listed, a NY Times article by a noted opponent of the TPm, reports "...likely to be more wealthy and have more education", both in the title and in the first paragraph. I don't doubt there are reliable sources which say the opposite, even ignoring questions of whether Politicois reliable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

So why is the "vogel1" article sourced? Also, the website seems to have taken it down?Smzcl (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)