November 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Squirm (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Out of Jimmy's Head with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. SeaphotoTalk 06:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hercules (1998 TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mall Tycoon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 5 albert square (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Master of Disguise, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smashingocarina (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The Great Valco is very displeased! Here i lay in front of you, honest man. I post information beneficial to the minds of readers, and it is constantly blocked? Here is an idea for you! Rather then have some cluebot revert everything intstantly, why not let an actual member with a comprehensive mind read the changes? The judgements here are too flawed. Valco wishes to spread knowledgeSmashingocarina (talk) 20:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed by CheckUser as to abusing multiple accounts. Talk page revoked. –MuZemike 20:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.