SloppyG
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article G-13, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The article Knowledge Generation Bureau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Promotional. The text and the sources of the article do not indicate sufficient notability. Is becoming a coatrack for similar products ("free alternatives").
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cs32en 11:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Knowledge Generation Bureau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Promotional. The text and the sources of the article do not indicate sufficient notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cs32en Talk to me 13:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Knowledge Generation Bureau edit
I have nominated Knowledge Generation Bureau, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge Generation Bureau. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cs32en Talk to me 17:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
A brownie for you! edit
|
Just interested in finding out what this does... SloppyG (talk) 16:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
Comparison of MySQL database engines edit
Surely this should be "Comparison of database engines for MySQL", or are you planning to limit it to just the MySQL branded ones and exclude the rest? The current form asserts that the engines covered are the property of the owner of the MySQL trademark, which isn't possible for the non-Oracle ones, while the revised one merely says that they work with it. That's probably what you intend. Though it makes no difference at this point because the only ones discussed are MySQL ones. Jamesday (talk) 12:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)