Slijk

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Slijk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mr Radio Guy !!! 22:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Slp1 (talk) 13:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Why didn't you warn User:Ostap R? Maybe because you have the same opinion on Lech Kaczyński? Slijk (talk) 13:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Why? Because you inserted the material four times, while Ostap R removed it only three times. (I thought it was twice but I see it was 3 times, now). In addition, another editor disagreed with the insertion too, as do I. You might want to review Wikipedia's rules of assume good faith. As it happens, I am not Polish, and have zero knowledge of Polish politics. What little I know suggests that they are not my cup of tea at all, but that is not the point. There are too many editors out there that wish to use these articles to suggest that the brothers are fascist, homosexual alcoholic, etc and base their edits on innuendo, rumours and long ago events where one party has apologized. This is not allowed per our very strict policy of biographies about living people, which is the reason that so many editors (including myself) disagreed with your edit.--Slp1 (talk) 12:17, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

User Slijk, it would be better if you assumed good faith towards other editors, and if you stopped adding rumors to the project. Perhaps it matters to you what Mr Palikot says, but his allegations are not encyclopedic and do not belong here. Tymek (talk) 04:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Krzysztof Skubiszewski

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. LeinaD (t) 13:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

[1] Wow! So you don't speak Polish? I don't believe it, because surely you read this article, which was written in Polish. So especially for you I've translated this message :). I have read the article, which you had indicated, but I haven't learned anything. It seems that you have entered an incorrect link. So I'm telling you once again: Wikipedia cannot announce the delicate and sensitive pieces of information (such as the possibility of collaboration with the Służba Bezpieczeczeństwa) on the basis of weak sources. In this case, sources of information are not primary sources (such as the chronicle of Długosz or the files of Institute of National Remembrance), but publications of historians who have studied this matter. An article in a newspaper is not a reliable source in such a serious matter. We need to remain cautious. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a newspaper. Wikipedia can not announce all pieces of information that anyone anywhere wrote, but only certain pieces of information. Wikipedia cannot afford to go through, which could denigrate the described people. Wikipedia have to remain cautious, so wikipedians cannot write about everything, which read anywhere. In this situation, more pass over in silence this matter than give information which may prove to be untrue. And it is not no censorship, but the standard of mature, reliable writing biographies. Regards, Wiktoryn (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC) PS. Remember, Wikipedia does not want to participate in political disputes.

Hi! I don't want to talk with you about unimportant matters. I'd like to talk with you about Skubiszewski and Hubner. About nothing more. Wiktoryn (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Danuta Hübner, here you are. Wiktoryn (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2010 (UTC)